...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Written Exams: How Effectively are We Using Them?
【24h】

Written Exams: How Effectively are We Using Them?

机译:笔试:我们如何有效地使用它们?

获取原文
           

摘要

In an outcomes-based education model, syllabi, learning activities and assessment tasks have to be aligned with the intended learning outcomes. This approach is known as Constructive Alignment. One of the major challenges in constructive alignment is the design of assessment tasks that are manageable, authentic, multi-dimensional, inclusive, equitable, valid and reliable. Trade-offs are inevitable; hence assessment tasks usually focus on particular aspects of the expected learning outcomes, while ignoring others. There is no such thing as the “silver bullet” assessment task. In this paper the use and format of assessments will be analysed and some ideas on how to design their effectiveness will be presented. The intention is to engage readers into reflecting on the effectiveness of the assessment methods they use, in particular: written exams.
机译:在基于结果的教育模型中,课程大纲,学习活动和评估任务必须与预期的学习结果保持一致。这种方法称为构造对齐。建设性一致性的主要挑战之一是评估任务的设计,这些评估任务是可管理,真实,多维,包容,公平,有效和可靠的。权衡是不可避免的;因此,评估任务通常侧重于预期学习成果的特定方面,而忽略其他方面。没有“银弹”评估任务。在本文中,将分析评估的用途和格式,并提出一些有关如何设计其有效性的想法。目的是让读者反思他们使用的评估方法的有效性,尤其是:笔试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号