首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Analysis of the Relationship between the Resiliency Level and Problem Solving Skills of University Students
【24h】

Analysis of the Relationship between the Resiliency Level and Problem Solving Skills of University Students

机译:大学生的抗逆能力与解决问题能力的关系分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Higher education is becoming increasingly student-oriented. Therefore, the examination of students’ personal and social qualities from different perspectives has become highly critical for educational researchers. Among those qualities that receive special attention by the educational researchers is resiliency. Resiliency can be described as the ‘self-corrective tendency’ that motivates people to develop as normal adults even in the most difficult situations, while resilient can be defined as a person who is resistant and flexible and also has the ability to heal quickly, get better, overcome challenges of all kinds of trauma, tragedy, personal crises, and problems (Bezmez, Blakney, Brown, 1999 cited in Gürgan, 2006). Resiliency is a particularly important quality for educational researchers as it strongly affects the students’ ability to bounce back stronger and wiser from any difficulties, and the social-cognitive development process of the individuals. On the other hand, problem solving ability is considered as another critical quality that the students must gain as it facilitates the process of problem definition, information- gathering regarding the problem, determination of any obstacles that can prevent the problem-solution, and the motivation towards problem-solving behavior (Davidson, Deuser ve Sternberg, 1994 cited in Sardo?an, Karahan, Kaygusuz, 2006). Undoubtedly, problem solving behavior is closely related with personal characteristics. People who possess good problem solving skills can have better lives than others as they are more successful in figuring out the best possible solutions and know how to behave in problematic situations. The purpose of this research is to investigate the resiliency level of university students by various variables and the relationship between their resiliency level and problem-solving abilities. A survey study method was employed in this research. Data was gathered from 325 students who studies at Yeditepe University in Istanbul during fall, 2012. The survey was composed of three different sections. First section is developed by the researchers to obtain the demographic information of the participants. Second section is composed of a Resilience scale which was developed by Gurgan (2006), while the third and the last section was composed of a Problem Solving Inventory which was developed by Heppner and Peterson (1982) and adapted into Turkish by Sahin, Sahin ve Heppner (1993). Both scales have high reliabilities with a Cronbach Alpha .80 and .88 respectively. Any increase in the resiliency mean score obtained from the scale can be interpreted as an increase in the resiliency level of the university students. The minimum score that can be obtained from the resiliency scale is determined as 50 while the maximum score is 250. On the other hand, the high scores obtained from the problem solving inventory indicates that the person has a negative perception about his/her problem solving skills, and perceives those skills as unsatisfactory. The score that can be obtained from the problem solving inventory ranges between 32 and 192. Research findings reveal that university students have high resiliency level with a sample mean of 190.07. Furthermore, no significant difference has been found in the resiliency level of university students in terms of gender, grade level, monthly income, and accommodation facilities (p 0.05). However, a significant difference has been found in their resiliency level in terms of faculty, work experience, academic achievement, self-perceived future job achievement, father's education level, parenting style and their description of selves (p0.05). Sample mean of problem-solving ability has been found as 92.82. The total score that can be obtained from Problem Solving Inventory ranges between 32 and 192. The low scores indicated that the person had effective and successful set of behaviors related to problem-solving, while the higher scores indicated that the person felt inadequate and poor in terms of problem-solving skills. Therefore, the mean score of 92.82 for problem-solving skills indicates that Yeditepe university students’ problem-solving skills are at the middle level. On the other hand, the Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.672 (p0.05) which was calculated for the relationship between resiliency and problem-solving skills of students indicated a positive and somewhat strong relationship between the resiliency level of university students and their problem-solving skills.
机译:高等教育越来越以学生为中心。因此,从不同的角度检查学生的个人和社会素质对教育研究人员来说变得至关重要。弹性受到了教育研究人员的特别关注。复原力可被描述为“自我矫正趋势”,即使在最困难的情况下也能促使人们成长为正常成年人,而复原力可被定义为具有抵抗力和灵活度,并且具有快速康复,康复的能力的人。更好,克服各种创伤,悲剧,个人危机和问题带来的挑战(Bezmez,Blakney,Brown,1999,Gürgan,2006中引用)。抵御力对于教育研究人员来说是特别重要的素质,因为它会极大地影响学生从任何困难中反弹并变得更加明智的能力以及个人的社会认知发展过程。另一方面,解决问题的能力被认为是学生必须获得的另一项重要素质,因为它促进了问题的定义,有关问题的信息收集,确定任何可能阻止问题解决的障碍以及动机的过程。迈向解决问题的行为(Davidson,Deuser ve Sternberg,1994年,引用于Sardo?an,Karahan,Kaygusuz,2006年)。毫无疑问,解决问题的行为与个人特征密切相关。拥有良好解决问题能力的人可以比其他人更好的生活,因为他们在找出最佳解决方案方面更成功,并且知道在有问题的情况下如何行事。这项研究的目的是通过各种变量来调查大学生的弹性水平以及他们的弹性水平与解决问题能力之间的关系。本研究采用调查研究方法。数据是从2012年秋季在伊斯坦布尔的伊迪特佩大学(Yeditepe University)学习的325名学生中收集的。该调查由三个不同的部分组成。研究人员开发了第一部分,以获取参与者的人口统计信息。第二部分由Gurgan(2006)开发的复原力量表组成,而第三部分和最后一部分由Heppner和Peterson(1982)开发并由Sahin,Sahin ve改编成土耳其语的问题解决量表组成。 Heppner(1993)。两种量表的Cronbach Alpha分别为.80和.88,具有很高的可靠性。从量表获得的弹性平均得分的任何提高都可以解释为大学生的弹性水平的提高。可以从弹性量表获得的最低分数确定为50,而最高分数则确定为250。另一方面,从问题解决清单中获得的高分表示该人对他/她的问题解决有负面看法技能,并认为这些技能不令人满意。从问题解决清单中可以获得的分数在32到192之间。研究发现表明,大学生的弹性水平很高,样本平均值为190.07。此外,在性别,年级,月收入和住宿设施方面,大学生的弹性水平没有显着差异(p> 0.05)。但是,在教职,工作经验,学业成就,自我感知的未来工作成就,父亲的教育程度,养育方式和自我描述方面,他们的弹性水平存在显着差异(p <0.05)。解决问题的能力的样本平均值为92.82。可以从“问题解决清单”中获得的总分在32到192之间。低分表明该人具有与问题解决相关的有效和成功的一系列行为,而高分表明该人在解决问题方面感到不足和贫穷。解决问题的能力。因此,解决问题技能的平均分数为92.82,表明Yeditepe大学生的解决问题技能处于中等水平。另一方面,根据学生的弹性与解决问题能力之间的关系计算的Pearson相关系数为-0.672(p <0.05),表明大学生的弹性水平与他们的问题之间存在正相关的关系,但存在一定的正相关关系。解决技巧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号