...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Don’t Pull me Out!? Preliminary Findings of a Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence on Experiences of Pupils with Special Educational Needs in Inclusive Education
【24h】

Don’t Pull me Out!? Preliminary Findings of a Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence on Experiences of Pupils with Special Educational Needs in Inclusive Education

机译:不要拉我出去!?对全纳教育中有特殊教育需要的小学生的经验的定性证据的系统评价的初步调查结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Problem Statement: A variety of studies evaluated the effect of inclusive education on pupils with special educational needs (SEN). The results from these studies are inconsistent, however none of the studies reported potential harmful effects. It remains unclear how inclusive education is experienced by pupils with SEN and what particular challenges they are faced with. Purpose of Study: This study aims to synthesize findings from qualitative research in order to present lines of action for teachers and school managers working in or considering inclusive education. Research Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was developed to obtain relevant qualitative studies (until December 2010). Papers that met our inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality by two independent reviewers, prior to inclusion in the review. We used the meta-aggregative approach to synthesis, which involves three phases: (1) assembling the findings of studies (variously reported as themes or categories); (2) pooling them through further aggregation based on similarity in meaning; and (3) arriving at a set of synthesized statements presented as ‘lines of action’ for practice and policy. Findings: The findings indicate that the pull-out classroom model is valued for its educational benefits, however, less appreciated for social reasons; the regular classroom teachers’ knowledge of and support for children with SEN is highly appreciated; the quality of the social network is a crucial factor for successful inclusion, and; the way pupils with SEN perceive themselves seems to affect their level of inclusion. Conclusions: Based on the preliminary findings we suggest that different actions on different levels of the school context could be considered: adjusting the learning environment in a way that pulling-out becomes redundant; training regular classroom teachers in providing behavioral and personal support; informing peers and observing relationships between pupils; recognizing negative feelings; encouraging pupils with SEN to change negative self-perceptions, and helping these pupils in developing successful coping strategies.
机译:问题陈述:多项研究评估了全纳教育对有特殊教育需求(SEN)的学生的影响。这些研究的结果不一致,但是没有研究报告潜在的有害影响。尚不清楚有特殊教育需要的学生如何经历全纳教育,以及他们面临哪些特殊挑战。研究目的:本研究旨在对定性研究的结果进行综合,以便为从事或考虑全纳教育的教师和学校管理人员提供行动方案。研究方法:制定了全面的搜索策略以获得相关的定性研究(至2010年12月)。符合我们纳入标准的论文在被纳入审查之前,由两名独立的审阅者进行了方法学质量评估。我们使用了元聚合方法进行综合,涉及三个阶段:(1)汇总研究结果(以主题或类别报道)。 (2)根据含义的相似性,通过进一步的汇总来合并它们; (3)得出一系列综合陈述,以实践和政策的“行动方针”呈现。调查结果:调查结果表明,抽出式教室模式因其教育收益而受到重视,但是由于社会原因,人们对它的重视程度较低;非常感谢普通班级老师对有特殊教育需要的儿童的知识和支持;社交网络的质量是成功融入社会的关键因素,并且;有特殊教育需要的学生感知自己的方式似乎会影响他们的融合程度。结论:基于初步的发现,我们建议可以考虑在不同的学校背景下采取不同的行动:以退出变得多余的方式调整学习环境;培训正规的课堂教师提供行为和个人支持;通知同伴并观察学生之间的关系;认识负面情绪;鼓励有特殊教育需要的学生改变负面的自我观念,并帮助他们制定成功的应对策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号