首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Should a Single Clinician Examiner be used in Objective Structure Clinical Examination?
【24h】

Should a Single Clinician Examiner be used in Objective Structure Clinical Examination?

机译:客观结构临床检查是否应使用一名临床医师检查员?

获取原文
           

摘要

The consistency in ratings provided by examiners can affect the reliability of the OSCE. This study was designed to identify the inter-rater reliability among examiners. This was a cross-sectional study involving 22 clinicians from all disciplines of medicine. An OSCE video was shown to each group and the examiners were to give their marks. The results showed a strong agreement among examiner in mixed discipline group (ICC=0.83), obstetrics & gynaecology group (ICC=0.84) and psychiatry group (ICC=0.88). Further analysis showed a moderate agreement among expert examiner (ICC=0.70) and non-expert examiners (ICC=0.78). We concluded that regardless the number of clinicians used as examiners in OSCE assessment, early exposure on OSCE, comprehensive training and OSCE station briefing prior to the examination are recommended.
机译:审查员提供的评分的一致性会影响欧安组织的可靠性。本研究旨在确定考官之间的评分者间信度。这是一项横断面研究,涉及22名来自各个医学领域的临床医生。向每个小组展示了一个OSCE视频,审查员要给他们打分。结果显示,混合学科组(ICC = 0.83),妇产科组(ICC = 0.84)和精神病学组(ICC = 0.88)的考官之间有很强的一致性。进一步的分析表明,专家审查员(ICC = 0.70)和非专家审查员(ICC = 0.78)之间的共识适中。我们得出的结论是,无论在OSCE评估中使用多少临床医生作为检查员,都建议在检查前尽早接触OSCE,进行全面培训并向OSCE进行简报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号