首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Does the Component Processes Task Assess Text-Based Inferences Important for Reading Comprehension? A Path Analysis in Primary School Children
【24h】

Does the Component Processes Task Assess Text-Based Inferences Important for Reading Comprehension? A Path Analysis in Primary School Children

机译:组件处理任务是否评估对阅读理解重要的基于文本的推理?小学生的路径分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Using a component processes task (CPT) that differentiates between higher-level cognitive processes of reading comprehension provides important advantages over commonly used general reading comprehension assessments. The present study contributes to further development of the CPT by evaluating the relative contributions of its components (text memory, text inferencing, and knowledge integration) and working memory to general reading comprehension within a single study using path analyses. Participants were 173 third- and fourth-grade children. As hypothesized, knowledge integration was the only component of the CPT that directly contributed to reading comprehension, indicating that the text-inferencing component did not assess inferential processes related to reading comprehension. Working memory was a significant predictor of reading comprehension over and above the component processes. Future research should focus on finding ways to ensure that the text-inferencing component taps into processes important for reading comprehension.
机译:与通常使用的一般阅读理解评估相比,使用区分阅读理解的高级认知过程的组件过程任务(CPT)提供了重要的优势。本研究通过使用路径分析评估CPT各个组成部分(文本记忆,文本推论和知识整合)和工作记忆对一般阅读理解的相对贡献,从而为CPT的进一步发展做出了贡献。参与者是173个三年级和四年级的孩子。如所假设的那样,知识整合是CPT唯一直接有助于阅读理解的成分,这表明文本推理成分并未评估与阅读理解有关的推理过程。工作记忆是构成过程之外的阅读理解的重要预测指标。未来的研究应着重于寻找方法,以确保文本推理组件能够进入对阅读理解至关重要的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号