...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Biofunctional Understanding and Conceptual Control: Searching for Systematic Consensus in Systemic Cohesion
【24h】

Biofunctional Understanding and Conceptual Control: Searching for Systematic Consensus in Systemic Cohesion

机译:生物功能的理解和概念控制:在系统凝聚力中寻找系统共识

获取原文

摘要

For first generation scientists after the cognitive revolution, knowers were in active control over all (stages of) information processing. Then, following a decade of transition shaped by intense controversy, embodied cognition emerged and suggested sources of control other than those implied by metaphysical information processing. With a thematic focus on embodiment science and an eye toward systematic consensus in systemic cohesion, the present study explores the roles of biofunctional and conceptual control processes in the wholetheme spiral of biofunctional understanding (see Iran-Nejad and Irannejad, 2017b, Figure 1). According to this spiral, each of the two kinds of understanding has its own unique set of knower control processes. For conceptual understanding (CU), knowers have deliberate attention-allocation control over their first-person “knowthat” and “knowhow” content combined as mutually coherent corequisites. For biofunctional understanding (BU), knowers have attention-allocation control only over their knowthat content but knowhow control content is ordinarily conspicuously absent. To test the hypothesis of differences in the manner of control between CU and BU, participants in two experiments read identical-format statements for internal consistency, as response time was recorded. The results of Experiment 1 supported the hypothesis of differences in the manner of control between the two types of control processes; and Experiment 2 confirmed the results of Experiment 1. These findings are discussed in terms of the predicted differences between BU and CU control processes, their roles in regulating the physically unobservable flow of systemic cohesion in the wholetheme spiral, and a proposal for systematic consensus in systemic cohesion to serve as the second guiding principle in biofunctional embodiment science next to physical science’s first guiding principle of systematic observation.
机译:对于认知革命之后的第一代科学家而言,知识者对所有(阶段的)信息处理都处于主动控制之下。然后,在经历了激烈争议的十年过渡之后,出现了具体化的认知,并提出了控制手段,而不是形而上学信息处理所隐含的控制手段。本专题以实施科学为主题,并在系统凝聚力上寻求系统共识,旨在探讨生物功能和概念控制过程在生物功能理解的整个主题螺旋中的作用(参见Iran-Nejad和Irannejad,2017b,图1)。根据这种螺旋关系,两种理解中的每一种都有自己独特的知识控制过程集。为了进行概念理解(CU),知识者对他们的第一人称“知道”和“知道如何”的内容进行了故意的注意力分配控制,这些内容被组合为相互一致的必要条件。对于生物功能理解(BU),知识者仅对他们知道的内容具有注意力分配控制,但通常不明显知道如何控制内容。为了检验CU和BU之间的控制方式差异的假说,两个实验的参与者读取了相同格式的语句以了解内部一致性,因为记录了响应时间。实验1的结果支持了两种控制过程之间控制方式不同的假设。实验2证实了实验1的结果。对这些发现进行了讨论,涉及的是BU和CU控制过程之间的预测差异,它们在调节整个主题螺旋中物理上无法观察到的系统内聚流中的作用以及在系统中达成共识的建议。系统凝聚力是生物功能体现科学中的第二个指导原则,仅次于物理科学的系统观察的第一个指导原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号