首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Macular choriovitreal membrane and macular traction syndrome: comparison with clinical, fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic findings.
【24h】

Macular choriovitreal membrane and macular traction syndrome: comparison with clinical, fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic findings.

机译:黄斑脉络膜玻璃膜和黄斑牵拉综合征:与临床,荧光素血管造影和光学相干断层扫描结果的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

?Purpose?Macular choriovitreal membrane (MCVM) is an epiretinal fibrovascular membrane adherent to the posterior vitreous hyaloid extending from the subfoveal space. We intended to evaluate preoperative and postoperative clinical features, fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic findings of MCVM by comparing with those of macular traction syndrome (MTS).?Methods?Consecutive nine MCVM patients and 103 MTS patients underwent successful vitrectomy by one surgeon due to symptomatic macular traction were identified through a retrospective chart review. All clinical data were reviewed for underlying ocular and systemic conditions, visual acuity, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FA) findings.?Results?MCVM patients were younger than MTS patients (55.1 years vs. 63.6 years, p=0.040) and showed worse visual acuity (LogMAR 1.27 vs. 0.66, p=0.001). When compared with MTS patients, MCVM patients showed higher association with previous laser history (44.4% vs. 18.4%, p=0.025), ocular comorbidities (100.0% vs. 41.8%, p=0.001), and diabetes (66.7% vs. 19.4%, p=0.030). While subfoveal fibrous stalk and photoreceptor disruption were noted in all of OCT data in patients with MCVM, only 2 patients (1.9%) with MTS showed photoreceptor disruption. In FA, 7 cases of MCVM (71.3%) demonstrated definite hyperfluorescence. Both MCVM and MTS patients showed significant decrease in central retinal thickness postoperatively owing to successful removal of macular traction (p=0.001). Although MTS patients showed marked visual improvement postoperatively (p=0.001), MCVM patients did not (p=0.355). Rather, MCVM patients showed improvement of central vision subjectively.?Conclusions?MCVM is the rarely reported disorder caused by the various pathologic vitreoretinal conditions. It is important to distinguish MCVM from MTS with thorough preoperative examination, because of their different surgical approach and postoperative prognosis. ?View OriginalDownload Slide?Optical coherence tomographic (OCT) findings of macular choriovitreal membrane and macular traction syndrome(MTS).?Optical coherence tomographic (OCT) findings of macular choriovitreal membrane and macular traction syndrome(MTS).View OriginalDownload Slide?View OriginalDownload Slide?Fluorescein angiographic(FA) findings of macular choriovitreal membrane.?Fluorescein angiographic(FA) findings of macular choriovitreal membrane.View OriginalDownload Slide? Keywords: 585 macula/fovea ? 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical ? 688 retina ?.
机译:“目的”黄斑脉络膜玻璃膜(MCVM)是粘附于从中央凹下间隙延伸的玻璃体后玻璃体的视网膜前纤维膜。我们打算通过与黄斑牵引综合征(MTS)进行比较,评估MCVM的术前和术后临床特征,荧光血管造影和光学相干断层扫描结果。通过回顾性图表审查确定症状性黄斑牵拉。回顾了所有临床数据,包括潜在的眼部和全身状况,视敏度,光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和荧光素血管造影(FA)结果。结果:MCVM患者比MTS患者年轻(55.1岁vs. 63.6岁,p = 0.040)并显示较差的视敏度(LogMAR 1.27对0.66,p = 0.001)。与MTS患者相比,MCVM患者与既往激光史(44.4%比18.4%,p = 0.025),眼合并症(100.0%比41.8%,p = 0.001)和糖尿病(66.7%vs.)的关联性更高。 19.4%,p = 0.030)。尽管在所有MCVM患者的OCT数据中均记录了小凹下纤维茎和感光器的破坏,但只有2例MTS患者(占1.9%)显示了感光器的破坏。在FA中,有7例MCVM(71.3%)表现出明确的过度荧光。 MCVM和MTS患者由于成功去除了黄斑牵拉,术后中央视网膜厚度均显着降低(p = 0.001)。尽管MTS患者术后有明显的视力改善(p = 0.001),但MCVM患者却没有(p = 0.355)。相反,MCVM患者在主观上显示出中心视力的改善。结论:MCVM是很少报道的由各种病理性玻璃体视网膜疾病引起的疾病。重要的是,通过彻底的术前检查将MCVM与MTS进行区分,因为它们的手术方式和术后预后不同。黄斑脉络膜玻璃体膜和黄斑牵引综合征(MTS)的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)结果。 Slide?黄斑脉络膜玻璃体膜的荧光素血管造影(FA)发现。?关键字:585黄斑/中央凹? 550成像/图像分析:临床688视网膜?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号