首页> 外文期刊>Applied Microbiology >Enzyme Treatment Reverse Transcription-PCR To Differentiate Infectious and Inactivated F-Specific RNA Phages
【24h】

Enzyme Treatment Reverse Transcription-PCR To Differentiate Infectious and Inactivated F-Specific RNA Phages

机译:酶处理逆转录PCR区分感染性和失活的F特异性RNA噬菌体

获取原文
       

摘要

F-specific (F+) RNA phages are recommended as indicators of fecal contamination and the presence of enteric viruses and as viral surrogates to elucidate the resistance of viruses to adverse conditions or to assess the effectiveness of inactivating processes. Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR methods have been used to detect, quantify, or identify subgroups of F+ RNA phages. However, these methods may overestimate the infectivity of F+ RNA phages in test samples, since the presence of both infectious and inactivated phages (or naked RNA) can lead to positive RT-PCR signals. In this study, we evaluated the ability of an enzyme treatment (ET) with proteinase K and RNase A prior to RNA extraction, followed by RT-PCR, to differentiate infectious and inactivated F+ RNA phages. The results indicated that ET RT-PCR reduced, but did not completely eliminate, false-positive signals encountered with RT-PCR alone. The two-step ET RT-PCR, in which the enzymes were added sequentially, was more effective at reducing false-positive signals than the one-step ET RT-PCR, which involved addition of both enzymes together. Despite its inability to completely eliminate false-positive signals, ET RT-PCR gave more reliable information on the infectivity of F+ RNA phages. Thus, the method is better than RT-PCR alone for detecting F+ RNA phages as indicators to assess the risk of fecal contamination by enteric pathogens or to evaluate the effectiveness of virus-inactivating processes.
机译:建议将F特异性(F +)RNA噬菌体作为粪便污染和肠道病毒存在的指标,并作为病毒替代品来阐明病毒对不利条件的抵抗力或评估灭活过程的有效性。逆转录(RT)-PCR方法已用于检测,定量或鉴定F + RNA噬菌体的亚组。但是,这些方法可能会高估测试样品中F + RNA噬菌体的传染性,因为感染性和灭活噬菌体(或裸露的RNA)的存在均会导致RT-PCR阳性信号。在这项研究中,我们评估了在提取RNA之前,先用蛋白酶K和RNase A进行酶处理(ET)的能力,然后进行RT-PCR,以区分感染性和失活的F + RNA噬菌体。结果表明,ET RT-PCR可减少但不能完全消除仅RT-PCR遇到的假阳性信号。两步ET RT-PCR(顺序添加酶)在减少假阳性信号方面比单步ET RT-PCR(将两种酶加在一起)更有效。尽管无法完全消除假阳性信号,但ET RT-PCR仍提供了有关F + RNA噬菌体感染性的更可靠信息。因此,该方法比单独使用RT-PCR更好,可以检测F + RNA噬菌体作为评估肠道病原体粪便污染风险或评估病毒灭活过程有效性的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号