首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Regional lung aeration and ventilation during pressure support and biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation in experimental lung injury
【24h】

Regional lung aeration and ventilation during pressure support and biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation in experimental lung injury

机译:实验性肺损伤中压力支持期间的局部肺通气和通气以及双相气道正压通气

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionThere is an increasing interest in biphasic positive airway pressure with spontaneous breathing (BIPAP+SBmean), which is a combination of time-cycled controlled breaths at two levels of continuous positive airway pressure (BIPAP+SBcontrolled) and non-assisted spontaneous breathing (BIPAP+SBspont), in the early phase of acute lung injury (ALI). However, pressure support ventilation (PSV) remains the most commonly used mode of assisted ventilation. To date, the effects of BIPAP+SBmean and PSV on regional lung aeration and ventilation during ALI are only poorly defined.MethodsIn 10 anesthetized juvenile pigs, ALI was induced by surfactant depletion. BIPAP+SBmean and PSV were performed in a random sequence (1 h each) at comparable mean airway pressures and minute volumes. Gas exchange, hemodynamics, and inspiratory effort were determined and dynamic computed tomography scans obtained. Aeration and ventilation were calculated in four zones along the ventral-dorsal axis at lung apex, hilum and base.ResultsCompared to PSV, BIPAP+SBmean resulted in: 1) lower mean tidal volume, comparable oxygenation and hemodynamics, and increased PaCO2 and inspiratory effort; 2) less nonaerated areas at end-expiration; 3) decreased tidal hyperaeration and re-aeration; 4) similar distributions of ventilation. During BIPAP+SBmean: i) BIPAP+SBspont had lower tidal volumes and higher rates than BIPAP+SBcontrolled; ii) BIPAP+SBspont and BIPAP+SBcontrolled had similar distributions of ventilation and aeration; iii) BIPAP+SBcontrolled resulted in increased tidal re-aeration and hyperareation, compared to PSV. BIPAP+SBspont showed an opposite pattern.ConclusionsIn this model of ALI, the reduction of tidal re-aeration and hyperaeration during BIPAP+SBmean compared to PSV is not due to decreased nonaerated areas at end-expiration or different distribution of ventilation, but to lower tidal volumes during BIPAP+SBspont. The ratio between spontaneous to controlled breaths seems to play a pivotal role in reducing tidal re-aeration and hyperaeration during BIPAP+SBmean.
机译:简介人们越来越对具有自发呼吸的双相气道正压(BIPAP + SBmean)感兴趣,这是在两个水平的持续气道正压(BIPAP + SB控制)和无辅助自发性呼吸(BIPAP)两种情况下的时间周期控制呼吸的组合+ SBspont),处于急性肺损伤(ALI)的早期阶段。但是,压力支持通气(PSV)仍然是最常用的辅助通气模式。迄今为止,对BIPAP + SBmean和PSV对ALI期间局部肺通气和通气的影响的定义还不清楚。方法在10只麻醉的幼猪中,ALI是由表面活性剂消耗引起的。 BIPAP + SBmean和PSV以可比的平均气道压力和分钟体积以随机顺序(各1小时)进行。确定气体交换,血流动力学和吸气强度,并获得动态计算机断层扫描。在肺尖,肺门和底部沿腹背轴的四个区域计算通气和通气量。结果与PSV相比,BIPAP + SBmean导致:1)平均潮气量降低,氧合和血流动力学相当,PaCO2和吸气量增加; 2)呼气末未充气区域减少; 3)减少潮气过度通气和再通气; 4)通风情况相似。在BIPAP + SB期间:i)BIPAP + SBspont的潮汐量和比率均高于BIPAP + SB所控制; ii)BIPAP + SBspont和BIPAP + SBcontrol的通气和通气分布相似; iii)与PSV相比,BIPAP + SB控制导致潮气增加和过度呼吸。结论:在这种ALI模型中,与PSV相比,BIPAP + SBmean期间的潮气和通气减少不是由于呼气末未通气面积减少或通气量不同而引起的,而是BIPAP + SBspont期间的潮气量。在BIPAP + SBmean期间,自发呼吸与控制呼吸之间的比例似乎在减少潮气和通气中起关键作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号