...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Performance of proficiency survey samples in two immunoradiometric assays of human growth hormone and comparison with patients' samples.
【24h】

Performance of proficiency survey samples in two immunoradiometric assays of human growth hormone and comparison with patients' samples.

机译:在两种人类生长激素免疫放射分析中的能力调查样本的性能,并与患者样本进行比较。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) used in our laboratory for the measurement of growth hormone (hGH; somatotropin) performed badly in the national proficiency survey program, the U.K. External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS). We compared our assay with another IRMA, which gave similar results for patients' samples and performed adequately in EQAS. The samples from EQAS are collected from patients with polycythemia and fall into two categories: those containing endogenous hGH and those supplemented with pituitary-derived hGH. Analysis of the two groups separately showed that the differences between the two IRMAS were in the measurement of the endogenous hormone. The reason for this appears to be a matrix effect related to the fact that the EQAS serum samples are collected from polycythemic patients.
机译:在我们的实验室中,用于测量生长激素(hGH;生长激素)的免疫放射分析(IRMA)在国家熟练度调查计划(英国外部质量评估计划(EQAS))中表现不佳。我们将我们的测定与另一种IRMA进行了比较,后者对患者的样品给出了相似的结果,并且在EQAS中表现良好。 EQAS的样本是从红细胞增多症患者中收集的,分为两类:含有内源性hGH的样本和补充有垂体源性hGH的样本。两组的分析分别表明,两种IRMAS之间的差异在于内源激素的测量。造成这种现象的原因似乎是与EQAS血清样本是从多囊性患者身上收集有关的基质效应有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号