...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Free thyroxine assessed with three assays in sera of patients with nonthyroidal illness and of subjects with abnormal concentrations of thyroxine-binding proteins.
【24h】

Free thyroxine assessed with three assays in sera of patients with nonthyroidal illness and of subjects with abnormal concentrations of thyroxine-binding proteins.

机译:在患有非甲状腺疾病的患者和甲状腺素结合蛋白浓度异常的患者的血清中,通过三种测定法评估了游离甲状腺素。

获取原文

摘要

Three methods for estimating free thyroxine (FT4) in serum were studied: equilibrium dialysis, the SPAC-ET FT4 radioimmunoassay kit, and the Amerlite MAB FT4 luminometric assay. Serum samples from 10 subjects with above-normal thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG), 6 with low TBG, 30 with familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia (FDH), 13 with nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) concentrations in serum 1.0 mmol/L, and 178 patients with various degrees of nonthyroidal illness (NTI) were measured and compared with samples from 42 euthyroid blood donors. The Amerlite MAB FT4 assay compared well with equilibrium dialysis, whereas the SPAC-ET assay averaged 40% lower. All three assays were not influenced by changes in TBG and showed no or only little changes in the presence of NEFA. Mean FT4 values in the FDH samples were somewhat higher than in controls when measured with the SPAC-ET assay, about equal with equilibrium dialysis, and somewhat below the mean control value with the Amerlite MAB FT4 assay, although individual results were within the control reference range. In NTI patients, no FT4 values were below the control reference range by the Amerlite MAB FT4 assay, 4 of 178 were below this range by equilibrium dialysis, and 1 of 178 was below this range by the SPAC-ET assay. In all assays a large proportion of the NTI samples showed FT4 values above the control reference range, a result that will interfere with the efficacy of these assays for assessing thyroid function in NTI patients.
机译:研究了三种评估血清中游离甲状腺素(FT4)的方法:平衡透析,SPAC-ET FT4放射免疫测定试剂盒和Amerlite MAB FT4发光测定法。来自血清甲状腺素结合球蛋白(TBG)高于正常水平的10名受试者的血清样品,低TBG的6名受试者,家族性神经营养不良性高甲状腺素血症(FDH)的30名受试者,血清中> 1.0 mmol / L的非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)的13名受试者和178名对患有各种程度的非甲状腺疾病(NTI)的患者进行了测量,并将其与来自42名正常甲状腺供血者的样本进行了比较。 Amerlite MAB FT4分析法与平衡透析法相比效果很好,而SPAC-ET分析法平均要低40%。三种测定均不受TBG变化的影响,在NEFA的存在下无变化或仅有很少变化。用SPAC-ET测定法测量时,FDH样品中的FT4平均值略高于对照,与平衡透析约相等,而使用Amerlite MAB FT4测定法的平均FT4值则略低,尽管个别结果在对照参考范围内范围。在NTI患者中,通过Amerlite MAB FT4分析,FT4值均未低于对照参考范围;通过平衡透析,178例中的FT4值低于此参考范围,而SPAC-ET分析法中178例中的FT4值低于此参考范围。在所有测定中,很大一部分NTI样品显示FT4值高于对照参考范围,该结果将干扰这些测定评估NTI患者甲状腺功能的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号