首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Commissioning for health improvement following the 2012 health and social care reforms in England: what has changed?
【24h】

Commissioning for health improvement following the 2012 health and social care reforms in England: what has changed?

机译:在2012年英格兰进行健康和社会护理改革后,委托进行健康改善:发生了什么变化?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The wide-ranging program of reforms brought about by the Health and Social Care Act (2012) in England fundamentally changed the operation of the public health system, moving responsibility for the commissioning and delivery of services from the National Health Service to locally elected councils and a new national public health agency. This paper explores the ways in which the reforms have altered public health commissioning. Methods We conducted multi-methods research over 33?months, incorporating national surveys of Directors of Public Health and local council elected members at two time-points, and in-depth case studies in five purposively selected geographical areas. Results Public health commissioning responsibilities have changed and become more fragmented, being split amongst a range of different organisations, most of which were newly created in 2013. There is much change in the way public health commissioning is done, in who is doing it, and in what is commissioned, since the reforms. There is wider consultation on decisions in the local council setting than in the NHS, and elected members now have a strong influence on public health prioritisation. There is more (and different) scrutiny being applied to public health contracts, and most councils have embarked on wide-ranging changes to the health improvement services they commission. Public health money is being used in different ways as councils are adapting to increasing financial constraint. Conclusions Our findings suggest that, while some of the intended opportunities to improve population health and create a more joined-up system with clearer leadership have been achieved, fragmentation, dispersed decision-making and uncertainties regarding funding remain significant challenges. There have been profound changes in commissioning processes, with consequences for what health improvement services are ultimately commissioned. Time (and further research) will tell if any of these changes lead to improved population health outcomes and reduced health inequalities, but many of the opportunities brought about by the reforms are threatened by the continued flux in the system.
机译:背景信息英国《健康与社会护理法》(2012年)带来了广泛的改革方案,从根本上改变了公共卫生体系的运作,将委托和提供服务的责任从国家卫生服务局移交给了地方选举的理事会。和一个新的国家公共卫生机构。本文探讨了改革改变公共卫生委托的方式。方法我们进行了长达33个月的多方法研究,纳入了两个时间点的全国公共卫生局长和地方理事会民选成员调查,并在五个有目的的地理区域进行了深入的案例研究。结果公共卫生委托职责已发生变化,并且变得越来越分散,由一系列不同的组织划分,其中大多数组织是在2013年新成立的。公共卫生委托的执行方式,由谁来做以及自改革以来的委托。与NHS相比,地方议会在决策方面的磋商更为广泛,而民选议员现在对公共卫生优先次序的影响很大。对公共卫生合同进行了更多(和不同)审查,大多数理事会已着手对其委托的健康改善服务进行广泛的变更。随着议会适应日益增加的财政约束,公共卫生资金的使用方式有所不同。结论我们的发现表明,尽管已经实现了一些预期的机会,以改善人口健康状况,并建立一个领导力更加清晰的更紧密的合作体系,但分散,决策分散和资金不确定性仍然是重大挑战。调试过程已发生了深刻的变化,最终改善了哪些健康改善服务。时间(以及进一步的研究)将证明这些变化是否导致了人口健康状况的改善和健康不平等的减少,但改革带来的许多机会却受到该体系不断变化的威胁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号