首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >User involvement in regulation: A qualitative study of service user involvement in Care Quality Commission inspections of health and social care providers in England
【24h】

User involvement in regulation: A qualitative study of service user involvement in Care Quality Commission inspections of health and social care providers in England

机译:用户参与法规:定性研究服务用户参与英格兰护理质量委员会对卫生和社会护理提供者的检查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background High profile failures of care in the NHS have raised concerns about regulatory systems for health‐care professionals and organizations. In response, the Care Quality Commission ( CQC ), the regulator of health and social care in England overhauled its regulatory regime. It moved to inspections which made much greater use of expert knowledge, data and views from a range of stakeholders, including service users. Objective We explore the role of service users and citizens in health and social care regulation, including how CQC involved people in inspecting and rating health and social care providers. Design We analyse CQC reports and documents, and 61 interviews with CQC staff and representatives of groups of service users and citizens and voluntary sector organizations to explore the place of service user voice in regulatory processes. Results Care Quality Commission invited comments and facilitated the sharing of existing service user experiences and engaged with representatives of groups of service users and voluntary sector organizations. CQC involved service users in their inspections as “experts by experience.” Information from service users informed both the inspection regime and individual inspections, but CQC was less focused on giving feedback to service users who contributed to these activities. Discussion and conclusions Service users can make an important contribution to regulation by sharing their experiences and having their voices heard, but their involvement was somewhat transactional, and largely on terms set by CQC . There may be scope for CQC to build more enduring relationships with service user groups and to engage them more effectively in the regulatory regime.
机译:背景国民保健服务系统(NHS)中引人注目的医疗服务失误引起了人们对医疗保健专业人员和组织监管体系的担忧。作为回应,英格兰的健康和社会护理监管机构护理质量委员会(CQC)对其监管制度进行了全面改革。它转向检查,更多地利用了包括服务用户在内的一系列利益相关者的专业知识,数据和观点。目的我们探讨服务使用者和公民在健康和社会护理法规中的作用,包括CQC如何让人们参与检查和评估健康和社会护理提供者。设计我们分析CQC的报告和文件,并与CQC员工以及服务用户团体代表以及公民和志愿部门组织进行61次访谈,以探索服务用户声音在监管流程中的位置。结果护理质量委员会(Care Quality Commission)邀请了评论并促进了现有服务用户经验的共享,并与服务用户组和志愿部门组织的代表进行了接触。 CQC以“经验丰富的专家”身份参与服务用户的检查。来自服务用户的信息同时告知了检查制度和个人检查,但是CQC不太注重向对这些活动做出贡献的服务用户提供反馈。讨论和结论服务用户可以通过分享经验和倾听声音来为监管做出重要贡献,但是他们的参与有些事务性,而且很大程度上取决于CQC设定的条款。 CQC有可能与服务用户组建立更持久的关系,并使他们更有效地参与监管体系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号