首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >The impact of the combination of income and education on the incidence of coronary heart disease in the prospective Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study
【24h】

The impact of the combination of income and education on the incidence of coronary heart disease in the prospective Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study

机译:卒中地理和种族差异的前瞻性原因中,收入和教育相结合对冠心病发病率的影响(REGARDS)队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

We investigated the association between income-education groups and incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in a national prospective cohort study. The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study recruited 30,239 black and white community-dwelling adults between 2003 and 2007 and collected participant-reported and in-home physiologic variables at baseline, with expert adjudicated CHD endpoints during follow-up. Mutually exclusive income-education groups were: low income (annual household income <$35,000)/low education (< high school), low income/high education, high income/low education, and high income/high education. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for incident CHD for each exposure group, examining differences by age group. At baseline, 24,461 participants free of CHD experienced 809 incident CHD events through December 31, 2011 (median follow-up 6.0?years; interquartile range 4.5–7.3?years). Those with low income/low education had the highest incidence of CHD (10.1 [95?% CI 8.4–12.1]/1000 person-years). After full adjustment, those with low income/low education had higher risk of incident CHD (HR 1.42 [95?% CI: 1.14–1.76]) than those with high income/high education, but findings varied by age. Among those aged <65?years, compared with those reporting high income/high education, risk of incident CHD was significantly higher for those reporting low income/low education and low income/high education (adjusted HR 2.07 [95?% CI 1.42–3.01] and 1.69 [95?% CI 1.30–2.20], respectively). Those aged ≥65?years, risk of incident CHD was similar across income-education groups after full adjustment. For younger individuals, low income, regardless of education, was associated with higher risk of CHD, but not observed for ≥65?years. Findings suggest that for younger participants, education attainment may not overcome the disadvantage conferred by low income in terms of CHD risk, whereas among those ≥65?years, the independent effects of income and education are less pronounced.
机译:在一项全国前瞻性队列研究中,我们调查了收入教育群体与突发性冠心病(CHD)之间的关联。 “卒中地理和种族差异的原因”研究在2003年至2007年期间招募了30,239名黑人和白人社区居民,并收集了基线时参与者报告的和家庭内的生理变量,并在随访过程中确定了CHD终点。相互排斥的收入教育群体是:低收入(家庭年收入<35,000美元)/低教育(<高中),低收入/高等教育,高收入/低教育和高收入/高等教育。 Cox模型估算了每个暴露组的冠心病的危险比(HR),并检查了不同年龄组的差异。基线时,截至2011年12月31日,无CHD的24,461名参与者经历了809起CHD事件(中位随访时间为6.0年;四分位间距为4.5-7.3年)。收入低/教育程度低的人冠心病的发生率最高(11000 [10.1 [95%CI 8.4-12.1] / 1000人年)。经过全面调整后,低收入/低学历者比高收入/高学历者患冠心病的风险更高(HR 1.42 [95%CI:1.14-1.76]),但发现随年龄的变化而变化。在65岁以下的人群中,与报告高收入/高学历的人群相比,报告低收入/低学历和低收入/高等教育的人群发生冠心病的风险显着更高(调整后的HR 2.07 [95%CI 1.42– 3.01]和1.69 [95%CI 1.30–2.20]。全面调整后,收入≥65岁的那些≥65岁的人群发生冠心病的风险相似。对于较年轻的人来说,不论接受何种教育,低收入都可能导致冠心病的发生,但在≥65岁的年龄中未观察到。研究结果表明,对于较年轻的参与者,就冠心病风险而言,受教育程度可能无法克服低收入所带来的劣势,而在≥65岁的人群中,收入和教育的独立影响并不​​那么明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号