...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight
【24h】

A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight

机译:小洞不补,大洞吃苦?关于跨部门社区方法实施的重复横断面案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The implementation of programs complex in design, such as the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight (JOGG), often deviates from their application as intended. There is limited knowledge of their implementation processes, making it difficult to formulate sound implementation strategies. For two years, we performed a repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of a JOGG fruit and water campaign targeting children age 0–12. Semi-structured observations, interviews, field notes and professionals’ logs entries were used to evaluate implementation process. Data was analyzed via a framework approach; within-case and cross-case displays were formulated and key determinants identified. Principles from Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) were used to identify causal configurations of determinants per sector and implementation phase. Implementation completeness differed, but was highest in the educational and health care sector, and higher for key than additional activities. Determinants and causal configurations of determinants were mostly sector- and implementation phase specific. High campaign ownership and possibilities for campaign adaptation were most frequently mentioned as facilitators. A lack of reinforcement strategies, low priority for campaign use and incompatibility of own goals with campaign goals were most often indicated as barriers. We advise multiple ‘stitches in time’; tailoring implementation strategies to specific implementation phases and sectors using both the results from this study and a mutual adaptation strategy in which professionals are involved in the development of implementation strategies. The results of this study show that the implementation process of IACOs is complex and sustainable implementation is difficult to achieve. Moreover, this study reveals that the implementation process is influenced by predominantly sector and implementation phase specific (causal configurations of) determinants.
机译:设计复杂的程序的实施,例如跨部门社区方法“健康体重的年轻人”(JOGG),通常会偏离其预期的应用。他们的执行过程知之甚少,因此很难制定合理的执行策略。两年来,我们针对以0-12岁儿童为对象的JOGG水果和水运动的实施情况进行了重复的横断面案例研究。半结构化观察,访谈,现场笔记和专业人员的日志条目用于评估实施过程。通过框架方法分析数据;制定了案例内和案例间展示,并确定了关键决定因素。使用定性比较分析(QCA)的原理来确定每个部门和实施阶段的决定因素的因果关系。实施的完整性有所不同,但在教育和卫生保健部门中最高,在关键活动方面比其他活动更高。行列式的决定因素和因果配置主要取决于部门和实施阶段。人们经常提到,竞选活动的高度主人翁精神和进行竞选活动的可能性是促进者。缺乏强化策略,竞选活动使用的优先级低以及自身目标与竞选目标不兼容通常被视为障碍。我们建议您进行多次“缝制”;使用本研究的结果和相互适应的策略,使实施策略针对特定的实施阶段和部门进行调整,在该策略中,专业人员将参与实施策略的制定。这项研究的结果表明,IACO的实施过程很复杂,难以实现可持续的实施。而且,这项研究表明,实施过程主要受部门和实施阶段特定(决定因素的因果配置)的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号