首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Protocol for a systematic review of the effects of schools and school-environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and syntheses
【24h】

Protocol for a systematic review of the effects of schools and school-environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and syntheses

机译:有系统地审查学校和学校环境干预措施对健康的影响的议定书:证据图谱和综合

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Schools may have important effects on students' and staff's health. Rather than treating schools merely as sites for health education, 'school-environment' interventions treat schools as settings which influence health. Evidence concerning the effects of such interventions has not been recently synthesised. Methods/design Systematic review aiming to map and synthesise evidence on what theories and conceptual frameworks are most commonly used to inform school-environment interventions or explain school-level influences on health; what effects school-environment interventions have on health/health inequalities; how feasible and acceptable are school-environment interventions; what effects other school-level factors have on health; and through what processes school-level influences affect health. We will examine interventions aiming to promote health by modifying schools' physical, social or cultural environment via actions focused on school policies and practices relating to education, pastoral care and other aspects of schools beyond merely providing health education. Participants are staff and students age 4-18 years. We will review published research unrestricted by language, year or source. Searching will involve electronic databases including Embase, ERIC, PubMed, PsycInfo and Social Science Citation Index using natural-language phrases plus reference/citation checking. Stage 1 will map studies descriptively by focus and methods. Stage 2 will involve additional inclusion criteria, quality assessment and data extraction undertaken by two reviewers in parallel. Evidence will be synthesised narratively and statistically where appropriate (undertaking subgroup analyses and meta-regression and where no significant heterogeneity of effect sizes is found, pooling these to calculate a final effect size). Discussion We anticipate: finding a large number of studies missed by previous reviews; that non-intervention studies of school effects examine a greater breadth of determinants than are addressed by intervention studies; and that intervention effect estimates are greater than for school-based health curriculum interventions without school-environment components.
机译:背景学校可能对学生和教职工的健康产生重要影响。 “学校环境”干预措施不仅仅将学校视为健康教育的场所,还把学校视为影响健康的环境。最近尚未综合有关此类干预措施影响的证据。方法/设计系统性审查,旨在就最常用于指导学校环境干预措施或解释学校水平对健康的影响的理论和概念框架进行映射和综合证据;学校环境干预措施对健康/健康不平等有何影响;学校环境干预措施的可行性和可接受性;其他学校层面的因素对健康有什么影响;以及学校层面的影响通过什么过程影响健康。我们将研究旨在通过修改学校的物理,社会或文化环境来促进健康的干预措施,这些措施的重点是与教育,教牧和学校其他方面有关的学校政策和实践,而不仅仅是提供健康教育。参与者是4-18岁的教职员工和学生。我们将审查发表的研究,不受语言,年份或来源的限制。搜索将涉及电子数据库,包括使用自然语言短语加上参考/引文检查的Embase,ERIC,PubMed,PsycInfo和Social Science Citation Index。第一阶段将通过重点和方法描述性地绘制研究图。第2阶段将包括两名评审员同时进行的其他纳入标准,质量评估和数据提取。证据将在适当的情况下通过叙事和统计进行综合(进行亚组分析和荟萃回归,并且在未发现显着的效应大小异质性的情况下,将其合并以计算最终效应大小)。讨论我们期望:找到以前的评论遗漏的大量研究;与学校干预相比,对学校效果的非干预性研究对决定因素的检查范围更大;并且干预效果的估算值要大于没有学校环境要素的学校卫生课程干预措施的估算值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号