...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Perceived risks and benefits of cigarette smoking among Nepalese adolescents: a population-based cross-sectional study
【24h】

Perceived risks and benefits of cigarette smoking among Nepalese adolescents: a population-based cross-sectional study

机译:尼泊尔青少年中吸烟的感知风险和益处:一项基于人群的横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The perceived risks and benefits of smoking may play an important role in determining adolescents’ susceptibility to initiating smoking. Our study examined the perceived risks and benefits of smoking among adolescents who demonstrated susceptibility or non susceptibility to smoking initiation. Methods In October–November 2011, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional study in Jhaukhel and Duwakot Villages in Nepal. Located in the mid-hills of Bhaktapur District, 13 kilometers east of Kathmandu, Jhaukhel and Duwakot represent the prototypical urbanizing villages that surround Nepal’s major urban centers, where young people have easy access to tobacco products and are influenced by advertising. Jhaukhel and Duwakot had a total population of 13,669, of which 15% were smokers. Trained enumerators used a semi-structured questionnaire to interview 352 randomly selected 14- to 16-year-old adolescents. The enumerators asked the adolescents to estimate their likelihood (0%–100%) of experiencing various smoking-related risks and benefits in a hypothetical scenario. Results Principal component analysis extracted four perceived risk and benefit components, excluding addiction risk: (i) physical risk I (lung cancer, heart disease, wrinkles, bad colds); (ii) physical risk II (bad cough, bad breath, trouble breathing); (iii) social risk (getting into trouble, smelling like an ashtray); and (iv) social benefit (looking cool, feeling relaxed, becoming popular, and feeling grown-up). The adjusted odds ratio of susceptibility increased 1.20-fold with each increased quartile in perception of physical Risk I. Susceptibility to smoking was 0.27- and 0.90-fold less among adolescents who provided the highest estimates of physical Risk II and social risk, respectively. Similarly, susceptibility was 2.16-fold greater among adolescents who provided the highest estimates of addiction risk. Physical risk I, addiction risk, and social benefits of cigarette smoking related positively, and physical risk II and social risk related negatively, with susceptibility to smoking. Conclusion To discourage or prevent adolescents from initiating smoking, future intervention programs should focus on communicating not only the health risks but also the social and addiction risks as well as counteract the social benefits of smoking.
机译:背景知识吸烟的风险和收益可能在确定青少年开始吸烟的敏感性中起重要作用。我们的研究检查了对吸烟开始表现出敏感性或非敏感性的青少年中吸烟的感知风险和益处。方法2011年10月至2011年11月,我们在尼泊尔的Jhaukhel和Duwakot村庄进行了基于人群的横断面研究。 Jhaukhel和Duwakot坐落在加德满都以东13公里处的Bhaktapur区的中山,代表了尼泊尔主要城市中心的典型城市化村庄,年轻人在这里可以轻松获得烟草制品,并受到广告的影响。 Jhaukhel和Duwakot的总人口为13,669,其中烟民占15%。受过训练的调查员使用半结构化问卷调查了352个随机选择的14至16岁青少年。枚举者要求青少年在假设的情景中估计他们遭受各种与吸烟有关的风险和收益的可能性(0%–100%)。结果主成分分析提取了四个成瘾风险和收益成分,不包括成瘾风险:(i)身体风险I(肺癌,心脏病,皱纹,重感冒); (ii)身体风险II(咳嗽,口臭,呼吸困难); (iii)社会风险(陷入困境,闻起来像烟灰缸); (iv)社会效益(看起来凉爽,放松,变得受欢迎和长大)。在对身体风险I的感知中,每增加四分位数,调整后的敏感性比值比增加1.20倍。在对身体风险II和社会风险进行最高估计的青少年中,吸烟的敏感性分别低0.27和0.90倍。同样,在提供最高成瘾风险估计的青少年中,易感性高2.16倍。与吸烟易感性有关,吸烟的身体风险I,成瘾风险和社会效益呈正相关,而吸烟的身体风险II和成瘾风险与社会风险呈负相关。结论为了阻止或阻止青少年吸烟,未来的干预计划不仅应关注健康风险,还应关注社会和成瘾风险,并抵消吸烟的社会效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号