...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Effect of peer support interventions on cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effect of peer support interventions on cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:同伴支持干预对成人糖尿病患者心血管疾病危险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Peer support by persons affected with diabetes improves peer supporter’s diabetes self-management skills. Peer support interventions by individuals who have diabetes or are affected by diabetes have been shown to improve glycemic control; however, its effects on other cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with diabetes are unknown. We aimed to estimate the effect of peer support interventions on cardiovascular disease risk factors other than glycemic control in adults with diabetes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing peer support interventions to a control condition in adults affected by diabetes that measured any cardiovascular disease risk factors [Body Mass Index, smoking, diet, physical activity, cholesterol level, glucose control and blood pressure]. Quality was assessed by Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. We calculated standardized mean difference effect sizes using random effects models. We retrieved 438 citations from multiple databases including OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane database and Scopus, and author searches. Of 233 abstracts reviewed, 16 articles met inclusion criteria. A random effects model in a total of 3243 participants showed a positive effect of peer support interventions on systolic BP with a pooled effect size of 2.07?mmHg (CI 0.35?mmHg to 3.79?mmHg, p?=?0.02); baseline pooled systolic blood pressure was 137?mmHg. There was a non-significant effect of peer support interventions on diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, body mass index, diet and physical activity. Cardiovascular disease risk factors other than glycemic control outcomes were secondary outcomes in most studies and baseline values were normal or mildly elevated. Only one study reported smoking outcomes. We found a small (2?mmHg) positive effect of peer support interventions on systolic blood pressure in adults with diabetes whose baseline blood pressure was on average minimally elevated. Additional studies need to be conducted to further understand the effect of peer support interventions on high-risk cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with diabetes.
机译:患有糖尿病的人的同伴支持提高了同伴支持者的糖尿病自我管理能力。糖尿病或糖尿病患者的同伴支持干预措施可改善血糖控制。然而,其对糖尿病成人其他心血管疾病危险因素的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估同伴支持干预措施对成年人糖尿病患者血糖控制以外的心血管疾病危险因素的影响。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,比较了同龄人的支持干预措施与患有糖尿病的成年人的对照状况,该措施测量了任何心血管疾病的危险因素[身体质量指数,吸烟,饮食,身体活动,胆固醇水平,血糖控制和血压]。通过Cochrane的偏见风险评估工具来评估质量。我们使用随机效应模型计算了标准化的平均差异效应大小。我们从多个数据库(包括OVID MEDLINE,Cochrane数据库和Scopus)检索了438条文献,并对作者进行了搜索。在233篇摘要中,有16篇符合纳入标准。在总共3243名参与者中的随机效应模型显示,同伴支持干预对收缩压有积极作用,合并效应大小为2.07?mmHg(CI为0.35?mmHg至3.79?mmHg,p?=?0.02)。基线合并收缩压为137?mmHg。同伴支持干预对舒张压,胆固醇,体重指数,饮食和身体活动没有显着影响。在大多数研究中,除血糖控制结果外,心血管疾病的危险因素是次要结果,基线值正常或轻度升高。只有一项研究报告了吸烟结局。我们发现同伴支持干预对基线血压平均最低程度升高的糖尿病成年人收缩压的积极作用很小(2?mmHg)。需要进行其他研究,以进一步了解同伴支持干预措施对成年人糖尿病高危心血管疾病危险因素的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号