首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Metformin versus placebo in combination with insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—the randomised, blinded Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial
【24h】

Metformin versus placebo in combination with insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—the randomised, blinded Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial

机译:二甲双胍与安慰剂联合胰岛素类似物治疗2型糖尿病患者的随机,盲法哥本哈根胰岛素和二甲双胍治疗(CIMT)试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To assess the effect of metformin versus placebo both in combination with insulin analogue treatment on changes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design and setting Investigator-initiated, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with a 2×3 factorial design conducted at eight hospitals in Denmark. Participants and interventions 412 participants with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.5% (≥58?mmol/mol); body mass index 25?kg/m2) were in addition to open-labelled insulin treatment randomly assigned 1:1 to 18?months blinded metformin (1?g twice daily) versus placebo, aiming at an HbA1c ≤7.0% (≤53?mmol/mol). Outcomes The primary outcome was change in the mean carotid IMT (a marker of subclinical cardiovascular disease). HbA1c, insulin dose, weight and hypoglycaemic and serious adverse events were other prespecified outcomes. Results Change in the mean carotid IMT did not differ significantly between the groups (between-group difference 0.012?mm (95% CI ?0.003 to 0.026), p=0.11). HbA1c was more reduced in the metformin group (between-group difference ?0.42% (95% CI ?0.62% to ?0.23%), p0.001)), despite the significantly lower insulin dose at end of trial in the metformin group (1.04?IU/kg (95% CI 0.94 to 1.15)) compared with placebo (1.36?IU/kg (95% CI 1.23 to 1.51), p0.001). The metformin group gained less weight (between-group difference ?2.6?kg (95% CI ?3.3 to ?1.8), p0.001). The groups did not differ with regard to number of patients with severe or non-severe hypoglycaemic or other serious adverse events, but the metformin group had more non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes (4347 vs 3161, p0.001). Conclusions Metformin in combination with insulin did not reduce carotid IMT despite larger reduction in HbA1c, less weight gain, and smaller insulin dose compared with placebo plus insulin. However, the trial only reached 46% of the planned sample size and lack of power may therefore have affected our results. Trial registration number NCT00657943; Results.
机译:目的评估二甲双胍与安慰剂联合胰岛素类似物治疗对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)的影响。设计和设定在丹麦的八家医院进行的由研究者发起的,随机,安慰剂对照试验,采用2×3因子设计。参与者和干预措施412名2型糖尿病(糖化血红蛋白(HbA 1c )≥7.5%(≥58?mmol / mol);体重指数> 25?kg / m2)的参与者标记的胰岛素治疗与安慰剂相比,随机分配1:1至18个月的盲目二甲双胍(每天两次,每次1微克),目的是使HbA 1c ≤7.0%(≤53?mmol / mol)。结果主要结果是平均颈动脉IMT(亚临床心血管疾病的标志)的变化。其他预先确定的结果包括HbA 1c ,胰岛素剂量,体重,降血糖和严重不良事件。结果两组间平均颈动脉IMT的变化无显着差异(组间差异为0.012?mm(95%CI为0.003至0.026),p = 0.11)。尽管二甲双胍组的胰岛素剂量显着降低,但二甲双胍组的HbA 1c 降低得更多(组间差异为0.42%(95%CI为0.62%至0.23%,p <0.001))。二甲双胍组试验结束时(1.04?IU / kg(95%CI 1.94至1.15)),而安慰剂组(1.36?IU / kg(95%CI 1.23至1.51),p <0.001)。二甲双胍组体重减轻(组间差异≤2.6千克(95%CI≤3.3至≤1.8),p <0.001)。两组患者的严重或非严重降血糖或其他严重不良事件的发生率无差异,但二甲双胍组的非严重降血糖事件较多(4347 vs 3161,p <0.001)。结论与安慰剂加胰岛素相比,二甲双胍联合胰岛素并不能降低颈动脉IMT,尽管HbA 1c 的降低幅度更大,体重增加较少且胰岛素剂量较小。但是,该试验仅达到计划样本量的46%,因此,缺乏功能可能会影响我们的结果。试用注册号NCT00657943;结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号