...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Identifying priority medicines policy issues for New Zealand: a general inductive study
【24h】

Identifying priority medicines policy issues for New Zealand: a general inductive study

机译:确定新西兰的优先药品政策问题:一般归纳研究

获取原文

摘要

Objectives To identify priority medicines policy issues for New Zealand. Setting Stakeholders from a broad range of healthcare and policy institutions including primary, secondary and tertiary care. Participants Exploratory, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 stakeholders throughout New Zealand. Primary and secondary outcome measures The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and coded into INVIVO 10, then compared and grouped for similarity of theme. Perceptions, experiences and opinions regarding New Zealand's medicines policy issues were recorded. Results A large proportion of stakeholders appeared to be unaware of New Zealand's (NZ) medicines policy. In general, the policy was considered to offer consistency to guide decision-making. In the context of Pharmaceutical Management Agency's (PHARMAC's) fixed budget for procuring and subsidising medicines, there was reasonable satisfaction with the range of medicines available—rare disorder medicines being the clear exception. Concerns raised were by whom and how decisions are made and whether desired health outcomes are being measured. Other concerns included inconsistencies in evidence and across health technologies. Despite attempts to improve the situation, lower socioeconomic groups (including rural residents) Māori and Pacific ethnicities and people with rare disorders face challenges with regards to accessing medicines. Other barriers include, convenience to and affordability of prescribers and the increase of prescription fees from NZ$3 to NZ$5. Concerns related to the PHARMAC of New Zealand included: a constraining budget; non-transparency of in-house analysis; lack of consistency in recommendations between the Pharmacology and Therapeutics Advisory Committee. Constraints and inefficiencies also exist in the submission process to access high-cost medicines. Conclusions The results suggest reasonable satisfaction with the availability of subsidised medicines. However, some of the major challenges include access to medicines in vulnerable groups, increasing costs and demand for new medicines, access to prescribers, budgetary constraints, cultural and health literacy, patient affordability and evidence requirement for gaining subsidy for medicines.
机译:目标确定新西兰的优先药品政策问题。从广泛的医疗和政策机构(包括初级,二级和三级护理)中确定利益相关者。参与者对整个新西兰的20个利益相关者进行了探索性,半结构化访谈。主要和次要成果测量方法将访谈进行数字记录,转录和编码为INVIVO 10,然后根据主题的相似性进行比较和分组。记录有关新西兰药品政策问题的看法,经验和意见。结果大部分利益相关者似乎都不了解新西兰的药品政策。通常,该政策被认为可以提供一致性以指导决策。在药品管理局(PHARMAC)用于采购和补贴药品的固定预算的背景下,对可用药品的范围有合理的满足-罕见疾病药品是明显的例外。所关注的问题是由谁以及如何做出决定以及是否正在衡量所需的健康结果。其他担忧包括证据和整个医疗技术之间的不一致。尽管人们试图改善这种状况,但较低的社会经济群体(包括农村居民),毛利人和太平洋种族以及患有罕见疾病的人在获得药物方面面临挑战。其他障碍包括开处方者的便利性和负担能力,以及处方费从3新西兰元增加到5新西兰元。与新西兰PHARMAC有关的问题包括:预算紧张;内部分析不透明;药理学和治疗学咨询委员会之间的建议缺乏一致性。在获取高价药品的提交过程中也存在制约因素和效率低下的问题。结论结果表明对补贴药物的可获得性有合理的满意度。但是,一些主要挑战包括在弱势群体中获得药品,新药的成本和需求增加,开处方者,预算限制,文化和健康素养,患者负担能力以及获得药品补贴的证据要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号