...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Comparing the performance characteristics of CSF-TRUST and CSF-VDRL for syphilis: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Comparing the performance characteristics of CSF-TRUST and CSF-VDRL for syphilis: a cross-sectional study

机译:比较CSF-TRUST和CSF-VDRL治疗梅毒的性能特征:一项横断面研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective In this study, we aimed to determine the performance characteristics of toluidine red unheated serum test on cerebrospinal fluids (CSF-TRUST) as compared to venereal disease research laboratory test on cerebrospinal fluids (CSF-VDRL) for laboratory the diagnosis of neurosyphilis. Design A cross-sectional study. Setting Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) clinics. Participants and methods CSF and serum samples were collected from 824 individual STD clinic patients who have syphilis and are suspected to progress to neurosyphilis within a 9-month period. CSF-VDRL and CSF-TRUST were performed parallelly on the same day when collected. Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) tests were also performed on the CSF and the serum samples, and biochemical analysis of the CSF samples was also performed. Results The overall agreement between CSF-TRUST and CSF-VDRL was 97.3%. The reactive ratios of the CSF samples were 22.1% by CSF-TRUST and 24.8% by CSF-VDRL, respectively. All CSF-TRUST-reactive cases were reactive in the CSF-VDRL. Twenty-two samples with CSF-TRUST-negative were tested CSF-VDRL-reactive with low titres (1?:?1 to 1?:?4). Over 97% of the double-reactive CSF samples (CSF-VDRL and CSF-TRUST) had an identical titre or a titre within a two-fold difference. The agreement of CSF-TPPA and CSF-VDRL was 71.9%. Similarly, the agreement of CSF-TPPA and CSF-TRUST was 69.2%. Conclusions Our results revealed that CSF-TRUST could be used as an option for CSF examination in settings without CSF-VDRL in place.
机译:目的在本研究中,我们旨在确定甲苯胺红未加热血清对脑脊髓液(CSF-TRUST)的检测性能与性病疾病对脑脊液(CSF-VDRL)进行实验室诊断以诊断神经梅毒的性能相比。设计横断面研究。设立性传播感染诊所。参与者和方法从824名患有梅毒并被怀疑在9个月内发展为神经梅毒的个体性病门诊患者中收集脑脊液和血清样本。 CSF-VDRL和CSF-TRUST在收集的同一天平行进行。还对脑脊液和血清样品进行了梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)测试,并对脑脊液样品进行了生化分析。结果CSF-TRUST和CSF-VDRL的总体一致性为97.3%。 CSF-TRUST测得的CSF样品的反应率为22.1%,CSF-VDRL测得的样品的反应率为24.8%。所有CSF-TRUST反应性病例均在CSF-VDRL中呈反应性。测试了22个CSF-TRUST阴性的样品,其CSF-VDRL反应性的滴度较低(1?:?1至1?:?4)。超过97%的双反应CSF样品(CSF-VDRL和CSF-TRUST)的滴度相同或滴度在两倍内。 CSF-TPPA和CSF-VDRL的一致性为71.9%。同样,CSF-TPPA和CSF-TRUST的协议为69.2%。结论我们的结果表明,在没有CSF-VDRL的情况下,CSF-TRUST可以作为CSF检查的选项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号