...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Glycaemic control efficacy of oral antidiabetic drugs in treating type 2 diabetes: a protocol for network meta-analysis
【24h】

Glycaemic control efficacy of oral antidiabetic drugs in treating type 2 diabetes: a protocol for network meta-analysis

机译:口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的血糖控制功效:网络荟萃分析方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction Past studies of network meta-analysis focused on evaluating drug combinations in treating type 2 diabetes but not on evaluating antidiabetic drugs in monotherapy. Clinical guidelines (eg, NICE (National Institute of Health and Care Excellence) clinical guidelines 66 and 87) were based only on the findings of individual clinical trials and pairwise meta-analysis in evaluating monotherapy. This study aims to fill this gap of research by conducting a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare major antidiabetic drugs, including metformin, glimepiride, glyburide, glipizide, repaglinide, nateglinide, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin and SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose transporter-2) inhibitors. Methods and analyses Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the drug therapy of type 2 diabetes with outcome measures including glycosylated haemoglobin or fasting blood glucose will be included. The quality of included RTCs will be evaluated according to the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Traditional pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis will be conducted to compare the efficacies of antidiabetic drugs. Sensitivity analysis on the sample size of RCTs, meta-regression analysis on the follow-up periods, dosages and baselines of outcome measure, contradiction analysis between pairwise and network meta-analyses, and publication bias analysis, will be performed. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required because this study includes no confidential personal data and interventions on the patients. Pairwise and network meta-analyses are based on the published RCT reports of eligible drugs in treating type 2 diabetes. The results of this study will be disseminated by a peer-reviewed publication. Protocol registration number PROSPERO CRD42014010567.
机译:简介过去的网络荟萃分析研究集中于评估2型糖尿病的药物组合,而不是单一疗法中的抗糖尿病药物。临床指南(例如,NICE(美国国家卫生与医疗保健研究院)临床指南66和87)仅基于单个临床试验和成对荟萃分析在评估单一疗法中的发现。本研究旨在通过进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析来比较主要的抗糖尿病药物,包括二甲双胍,格列美脲,格列本脲,格列吡嗪,瑞格列奈,那格列奈,西他列汀,维达列汀,沙格列汀和SGLT-2(钠葡萄糖转运蛋白),以填补这一研究空白。 -2)抑制剂。方法和分析将包括2型糖尿病药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT),其结果包括糖基化血红蛋白或空腹血糖。包含的RTC的质量将根据Cochrane协作组织的偏见风险评估。将进行传统的成对荟萃分析和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析来比较抗糖尿病药物的疗效。将对RCT的样本量进行敏感性分析,对随访期,结果测量的剂量和基线进行荟萃回归分析,进行成对和网络荟萃分析之间的矛盾分析,以及发表偏倚分析。伦理和传播不需要伦理批准,因为该研究不包含任何机密个人数据和对患者的干预措施。配对和网络荟萃分析基于已发表的治疗2型糖尿病的合格药物的RCT报告。这项研究的结果将由经过同行评审的出版物传播。协议注册号PROSPERO CRD42014010567。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号