首页> 外文期刊>Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism >Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real‐world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)
【24h】

Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real‐world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)

机译:评估患者对患者的血糖控制在现实世界中的口腔抗糖尿病药物中不良控制:评估2型糖尿病的适当时间(达到)

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control despite recommended treatment strategies to reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). This real‐world retrospective cohort study compared HbA1c change and treatment patterns between those intensifying and not intensifying therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Materials and methods Patients suboptimally controlled on OADs (58?mmol/mol [7.5%] or 64?mmol/mol [8.0%] for high risk, index 1) were included from IQVIA Medical Research Data. Intensifiers within 12?months of index 1 were matched (1:1) to nonintensifiers. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of participants achieving HbA1c targets 6 and 12?months post‐index 2 (date of intensification [intensifiers] or pseudodate [nonintensifiers]). Therapy adherence was also assessed. Results A total of 10?832 participants (5539 intensifiers and 5293 nonintensifiers) were included. Mean HbA1c decrease from baseline to 6?months was ?1.13% (intensifiers) vs ?0.75% (nonintensifiers), with no substantial further change at 12?months. Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis suggested a nearly 20% greater chance of target achievement at 6?months for intensifiers vs nonintensifiers (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73‐0.86]), which was similar at 12?months (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74‐0.86]). Intensifiers tended towards greater adherence to baseline therapy (90% [standard deviation (SD): 14.9] vs nonintensifiers 87% [SD: 16.0]), which decreased following intensification. Conclusions Significant reductions in HbA1c were evident at 6?months and were greater in intensifiers vs nonintensifiers. Little additional clinical benefit was seen 12?months postintensification. Despite good treatment adherence, many participants failed to achieve target HbA1c; actions beyond improved adherence are needed to improve suboptimal HbA1c.
机译:尽管推荐治疗策略减少糖化血红蛋白(HBA1c),但许多患有2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病(DM)未能实现血糖控制。这种现实世界的回顾队列研究比较了与口腔抗糖尿病药物(OADS)的增强和不加剧治疗之间的HBA1C变化和治疗模式。材料和方法在OAD上均邻近控制(> 58×mmol / mol [> 7.5%]或> 64.莫尔/ mol [> 8.0%],以IQVIA医学研究数据包括在IQVIA医学研究数据中。 12?几个月内的凝固剂匹配(1:1)到非抗囊剂。主要结果是HBA1C的变化和参与者的比例,实现HBA1C靶6和12?月后的次数2(强化日期[肠梗)或假阳剂[非诱导剂])。治疗依从性也评估。结果共有10个?832名参与者(5539升级,和5293个非诱导者)。平均HBA1c从基线减少到6?月份是?1.13%(强化剂)与α.0.75%(非胶囊),12个月没有大量进一步变化。 Cox比例危害(pH)分析表明,针对抗抗感转换器的6?数月VS非活化剂(危险比[HR]:0.79 [95%]:0.73-0.86]),近似20%的目标成就的可能性近20%相似于12?月(HR:0.80 [95%CI:0.74-0.86])。增强症倾向于更加遵守基线治疗(90%[标准偏差(SD):14.9] VS非抗胶质剂87%[SD:16.0]),其在增强后降低。结论HBA1C的显着减少在6?个月内显而易见,并且在肠梗阻中更大,vs unitentifiers更大。稍微额外的临床福利被介绍12?月份。尽管良好的待遇遵守,但许多参与者未能实现目标HBA1C;需要超出改善遵守的行动来改善次优的HBA1c。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号