...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
【24h】

Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

机译:饮食和运动行为的社交媒体干预:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives To conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of social media to promote healthy diet and exercise in the general population. Data sources MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Alt Health Watch, Health Source, Communication and Mass Media Complete, Web of Knowledge and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis (2000–2013). Study eligibility criteria RCTs of social media interventions promoting healthy diet and exercise behaviours in the general population were eligible. Interventions using social media, alone or as part of a complex intervention, were included. Study appraisal and synthesis Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We describe the studies according to the target populations, objectives and nature of interventions, outcomes examined, and results and conclusions. We extracted data on the primary and secondary outcomes examined in each study. Where the same outcome was assessed in at least three studies, we combined data in a meta-analysis. Results 22 studies were included. Participants were typically middle-aged Caucasian women of mid-to-high socioeconomic status. There were a variety of interventions, comparison groups and outcomes. All studies showed a decrease in programme usage throughout the intervention period. Overall, no significant differences were found for primary outcomes which varied across studies. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in changes in physical activity (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.13 (95% CI ?0.04 to 0.30), 12 studies) and weight (SMD ?0.00 (95% CI ?0.19 to 0.19), 10 studies); however, pooled results from five studies showed a significant decrease in dietary fat consumption with social media (SMD ?0.35 (95% CI ?0.68 to ?0.02)). Conclusions Social media may provide certain advantages for public health interventions; however, studies of social media interventions to date relating to healthy lifestyles tend to show low levels of participation and do not show significant differences between groups in key outcomes.
机译:目的对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价,研究使用社交媒体促进普通人群健康饮食和锻炼的情况。数据来源MEDLINE,CENTRAL,ERIC,PubMed,CINAHL,学术搜索完成,Alt Health Watch,健康来源,传播和大众媒体完成,Web of Knowledge和ProQuest论文与论文(2000-2013年)。符合研究标准的社会媒体在普通人群中促进健康饮食和运动行为的RCT符合条件。包括单独使用社交媒体或作为复杂干预的一部分进行的干预。研究评估和综合使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。我们根据目标人群,干预的目的和性质,检查的结果以及结果和结论来描述研究。我们提取了每项研究中检查的主要和次要结局的数据。在至少三项研究中评估了相同结果的情况下,我们在荟萃分析中合并了数据。结果纳入22项研究。参加者通常是社会经济地位中到高的中年白人妇女。有各种各样的干预措施,比较组和结果。所有研究表明,在整个干预期间,程序使用率均下降。总体而言,在各研究中发现的主要结局均无显着差异。荟萃分析显示,体育锻炼(标准平均差异(SMD)为0.13(95%CI为0.04至0.30),12个研究)和体重(SMD为0.00(95%CI为0.19至0.19)10,没有显着差异10学习);然而,来自五项研究的汇总结果显示,社交媒体的饮食脂肪消耗量显着减少(SMD≤0.35(95%CI≤0.68至≤0.02))。结论社交媒体可以为公共卫生干预提供一定的优势。然而,迄今为止,有关健康生活方式的社交媒体干预研究倾向于显示参与度较低,并且在关键结局上两组之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号