...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Genomics >Genome wide signatures of positive selection: The comparison of independent samples and the identification of regions associated to traits
【24h】

Genome wide signatures of positive selection: The comparison of independent samples and the identification of regions associated to traits

机译:阳性选择的全基因组特征:独立样本的比较和性状相关区域的鉴定

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The goal of genome wide analyses of polymorphisms is to achieve a better understanding of the link between genotype and phenotype. Part of that goal is to understand the selective forces that have operated on a population. Results In this study we compared the signals of selection, identified through population divergence in the Bovine HapMap project, to those found in an independent sample of cattle from Australia. Evidence for population differentiation across the genome, as measured by FST, was highly correlated in the two data sets. Nevertheless, 40% of the variance in FST between the two studies was attributed to the differences in breed composition. Seventy six percent of the variance in FST was attributed to differences in SNP composition and density when the same breeds were compared. The difference between FST of adjacent loci increased rapidly with the increase in distance between SNP, reaching an asymptote after 20 kb. Using 129 SNP that have highly divergent FST values in both data sets, we identified 12 regions that had additive effects on the traits residual feed intake, beef yield or intramuscular fatness measured in the Australian sample. Four of these regions had effects on more than one trait. One of these regions includes the R3HDM1 gene, which is under selection in European humans. Conclusion Firstly, many different populations will be necessary for a full description of selective signatures across the genome, not just a small set of highly divergent populations. Secondly, it is necessary to use the same SNP when comparing the signatures of selection from one study to another. Thirdly, useful signatures of selection can be obtained where many of the groups have only minor genetic differences and may not be clearly separated in a principal component analysis. Fourthly, combining analyses of genome wide selection signatures and genome wide associations to traits helps to define the trait under selection or the population group in which the QTL is likely to be segregating. Finally, the FST difference between adjacent loci suggests that 150,000 evenly spaced SNP will be required to study selective signatures in all parts of the bovine genome.
机译:背景技术全基因组多态性分析的目的是更好地了解基因型和表型之间的联系。该目标的一部分是了解对人口起作用的选择性力量。结果在本研究中,我们将通过牛HapMap项目中的种群差异确定的选择信号与在澳大利亚的独立牛样本中发现的选择信号进行了比较。用F ST 测量的整个基因组中的群体分化证据在两个数据集中高度相关。尽管如此,两项研究之间F ST 的40%的差异归因于品种组成的差异。比较同一品种时,F ST 中76%的变异归因于SNP组成和密度的差异。相邻基因座的F ST 之间的差异随着SNP之间距离的增加而迅速增加,在20 kb后达到渐近线。使用在两个数据集中具有高度差异的F ST 值的129个SNP,我们确定了12个区域,这些区域对澳大利亚样品中测得的残余饲料摄入量,牛肉产量或肌肉内脂肪性状具有累加作用。这些区域中有四个对一个以上的性状有影响。这些区域之一包括R3HDM1基因,该基因正在欧洲人类中进行选择。结论首先,对于整个基因组的选择性标记的完整描述,许多不同的种群将是必需的,而不仅仅是少数高度分化的种群。其次,在将一项研究与另一项研究的选择特征进行比较时,有必要使用相同的SNP。第三,在许多组只有很小的遗传差异并且在主成分分析中可能没有明确区分的情况下,可以获得有用的选择标记。第四,将对全基因组选择特征的分析和对特征的全基因组关联相结合,有助于确定选择的性状或QTL可能在其中分离的种群。最后,相邻基因座之间的F 差异表明,需要150000个均匀间隔的SNP来研究牛基因组​​所有部分的选择性标记。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号