首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Answers to Health Questions: Internet Search Results Versus Online Health Community Responses
【24h】

Answers to Health Questions: Internet Search Results Versus Online Health Community Responses

机译:健康问题的答案:Internet搜索结果与在线健康社区的回答

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: About 6 million people search for health information on the Internet each day in the United States. Both patients and caregivers search for information about prescribed courses of treatments, unanswered questions after a visit to their providers, or diet and exercise regimens. Past literature has indicated potential challenges around quality in health information available on the Internet. However, diverse information exists on the Internet—ranging from government-initiated webpages to personal blog pages. Yet we do not fully understand the strengths and weaknesses of different types of information available on the Internet.Objective: The objective of this research was to investigate the strengths and challenges of various types of health information available online and to suggest what information sources best fit various question types.Methods: We collected questions posted to and the responses they received from an online diabetes community and classified them according to Rothwell’s classification of question types (fact, policy, or value questions). We selected 60 questions (20 each of fact, policy, and value) and the replies the questions received from the community. We then searched for responses to the same questions using a search engine and recorded theResults: Community responses answered more questions than did search results overall. Search results were most effective in answering value questions and least effective in answering policy questions. Community responses answered questions across question types at an equivalent rate, but most answered policy questions and the least answered fact questions. Value questions were most answered by community responses, but some of these answers provided by the community were incorrect. Fact question search results were the most clinically valid.Conclusions: The Internet is a prevalent source of health information for people. The information quality people encounter online can have a large impact on them. We present what kinds of questions people ask online and the advantages and disadvantages of various information sources in getting answers to those questions. This study contributes to addressing people’s online health information needs.
机译:背景:在美国,每天约有600万人在互联网上搜索健康信息。患者和护理人员均会搜索有关处方治疗方案的信息,拜访其提供者后未回答的问题或饮食和运动方案的信息。过去的文献表明,在互联网上可获得的健康信息质量方面存在潜在的挑战。但是,Internet上存在各种各样的信息-从政府启动的网页到个人博客页面。然而,我们还没有完全理解互联网上各种类型信息的优缺点。目的:本研究的目的是调查各种在线健康信息的优缺点,并提出最适合的信息来源方法:我们收集了发布到网上糖尿病社区的问题以及他们从在线糖尿病社区获得的答复,并根据罗斯威尔对问题类型(事实,政策或价值问题)的分类进行了分类。我们选择了60个问题(每个事实,政策和价值20个问题),并回答了从社区收到的问题。然后,我们使用搜索引擎搜索了对相同问题的回答,并记录了结果:社区回答比整体搜索结果回答了更多问题。搜索结果在回答价值问题时最有效,而在回答政策问题时效果最差。社区响应以相同的比率回答了所有问题类型的问题,但回答最多的是政策问题,回答最少的是事实问题。社区的回答最多可以回答价值问题,但是社区提供的一些答案是不正确的。事实问题搜索结果在临床上最有效。结论:互联网是人们健康信息的普遍来源。人们在网上遇到的信息质量可能会对他们产生很大的影响。我们将介绍人们在网上提出哪些问题,以及各种信息源在获取这些问题的答案方面的优缺点。这项研究有助于解决人们的在线健康信息需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号