...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Interprofessional Communication of Clinicians Using a Mobile Phone App: A Randomized Crossover Trial Using Simulated Patients
【24h】

Interprofessional Communication of Clinicians Using a Mobile Phone App: A Randomized Crossover Trial Using Simulated Patients

机译:使用手机应用程序进行临床医生的专业间交流:使用模拟患者的随机交叉试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Most hospitals use paging systems as the principal communication system, despite general dissatisfaction by end users. To this end, we developed an app-based communication system (called Hark) to facilitate and improve the quality of interpersonal communication.Objective: The objectives of our study were (1) to assess the quality of information transfer using pager- and app-based (Hark) communication systems, (2) to determine whether using mobile phone apps for escalation of care results in additional delays in communication, and (3) to determine how end users perceive mobile phone apps as an alternative to pagers.Methods: We recruited junior (postgraduate year 1 and 2) doctors and nurses from a range of specialties and randomly assigned them to 2 groups who used either a pager device or the mobile phone-based Hark app. We asked nurses to hand off simulated patients while doctors were asked to receive handoff information using these devices. The quality of information transfer, time taken to respond to messages, and users’ satisfaction with each device was recorded. Each participant used both devices with a 2-week washout period in between uses.Results: We recruited 22 participants (13 nurses, 9 doctors). The quality of the referrals made by nurses was significantly better when using Hark (Hark median 118, range 100–121 versus pager median 77, range 39–104; P=.001). Doctors responded to messages using Hark more quickly than when responding to pagers, although this difference was not statistically significant (Hark mean 86.6 seconds, SD 96.2 versus pager mean 136.5 seconds, SD 201.0; P=.12). Users rated Hark as significantly better on 11 of the 18 criteria of an information transfer device (P<.05) These included “enhances interprofessional efficiency,” “results in less disturbance,” “performed desired functions reliably,” and “allows me to clearly transfer information.”Conclusions: Hark improved the quality of transfer of information about simulated patients and was rated by users as more effective and efficient, and less distracting than pagers. Using this device did not result in delay in patient care.
机译:背景:尽管最终用户普遍不满意,但大多数医院仍将寻呼系统用作主要通信系统。为此,我们开发了一种基于应用程序的通讯系统(称为Hark),以促进和改善人际交流的质量。目的:我们的研究目标是(1)使用传呼机和应用程序评估信息传输的质量基于(Hark)的通信系统,(2)确定使用手机应用程序进行护理升级是否会导致通信方面的额外延迟,以及(3)确定最终用户如何将手机应用程序视为寻呼机的替代方法。从一系列专业中招募了初级(研究生一年级和二年级)医生和护士,并将他们随机分配到两个使用寻呼机设备或基于手机的Hark应用程序的组。我们要求护士交出模拟病人,同时要求医生使用这些设备接收交接信息。记录信息传输的质量,响应消息所花费的时间以及用户对每台设备的满意度。每个参与者都使用这两种设备,两次使用之间的清洗期为2周。结果:我们招募了22名参与者(13名护士,9名医生)。使用Hark时,护士的转诊质量明显更好(Hark中位数118,范围100-121,而传呼机中位数77,范围39-104; P = .001)。与使用寻呼机响应相比,医生使用Hark响应消息的速度更快,尽管这种差异在统计学上并不显着(Hark平均为86.6秒,SD为96.2,而寻呼机平均为136.5秒,SD为201.0; P = .12)。在信息传递设备的18个标准中,有11个用户对Hark的评价为明显好(P <.05),其中包括“增强行业效率”,“减少干扰”,“可靠地执行所需功能”和“允许我结论:Hark提高了有关模拟患者信息的传输质量,并被用户评为比传呼机更有效,更高效,更分散注意力。使用此设备不会导致患者护理延迟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号