首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Metabolic Effects of Basal or Premixed Insulin Treatment in 5077 Insulin-Na?ve Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Registry-Based Observational Study in Clinical Practice
【24h】

Metabolic Effects of Basal or Premixed Insulin Treatment in 5077 Insulin-Na?ve Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Registry-Based Observational Study in Clinical Practice

机译:基础或预混合胰岛素治疗5077胰岛素纯净2型糖尿病患者的代谢作用:基于登记的临床观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction To investigate the clinical effects associated with premixed insulin (PM) and basal insulin [insulin NPH (NPH), insulin glargine (IG), insulin detemir (ID)], in insulin-na?ve patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical care. Materials and Methods Cohort study based on data from the Swedish National Diabetes Register, including 5,077 patients, resident in the Western region of Sweden. Patients were included between 1 July 2006 and 31 December 2009 and followed for 12?months. Changes in HbA1c, body mass index (BMI) and required insulin doses were compared between the different insulin types. Covariance adjustments were performed to adjust for differences between the groups. Results NPH, IG, ID and PM were all associated with significant reductions in HbA1c, mean?±?standard deviation ranged between 6.6?±?17.4?mmol/mol (IG) and 8.9?±?17.7?mmol/mol (NPH), during the 12?months of follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in the magnitude of HbA1c reduction between the insulin types. PM required 59% higher and ID 25% higher insulin doses to achieve a similar HbA1c reduction as NPH. PM was associated with a significantly greater increase in BMI compared with NPH ( p =?0.016), while IG and ID did not differ significantly from NPH. The number of patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia was low, but highest in patients treated with PM ( p =?0.023). Conclusions NPH, IG, ID and PM were found to be equally effective in lowering HbA1c in insulin-na?ve patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical care in Sweden. The effects on weight, dose and treatment persistence support the recommendation of NPH or IG as first and second choices in this group of patients requiring initiation of insulin treatment.
机译:简介在常规临床中,研究预混合胰岛素(PM)和基础胰岛素[胰岛素NPH(NPH),甘精胰岛素(IG),地特胰岛素(ID)]的临床疗效关心。资料和方法队列研究基于瑞典国家糖尿病登记处的数据,包括居住在瑞典西部地区的5,077名患者。患者于2006年7月1日至2009年12月31日期间被纳入研究,随访12个月。比较了不同类型胰岛素之间HbA1c,体重指数(BMI)和所需胰岛素剂量的变化。进行协方差调整以调整组之间的差异。结果NPH,IG,ID和PM均与HbA1c的显着降低有关,均值±标准偏差在6.6?±?17.4?mmol / mol(IG)和8.9?±?17.7?mmol / mol(NPH)之间。 ,在随访的12个月内。在两种胰岛素类型之间,HbA1c降低的幅度没有统计学上的显着差异。 PM所需的胰岛素剂量要高59%,ID的胰岛素剂量要高25%,才能实现与NPH相似的HbA1c降低。与NPH相比,PM与BMI的显着增加有关(p =?0.016),而IG和ID与NPH没有显着差异。发生严重低血糖的患者人数很少,但接受PM治疗的患者最多(p =?0.023)。结论在瑞典的常规临床护理中,发现NPH,IG,ID和PM可以有效降低初治胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者的HbA1c。对体重,剂量和治疗持续时间的影响支持将NPH或IG推荐为这组需要开始胰岛素治疗的患者的首选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号