首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology >Investigation of Gender Differences and Exclusive Criteria in a Diabetic Acute Ischemic Stroke Population Treated with Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator (rtPA)
【24h】

Investigation of Gender Differences and Exclusive Criteria in a Diabetic Acute Ischemic Stroke Population Treated with Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator (rtPA)

机译:重组组织型纤溶酶原激活物(rtPA)治疗的糖尿病急性缺血性卒中人群的性别差异和唯一标准的调查。

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Many studies have reported that women who survive stroke have less favorable outcomes than men in the use of rtPA, while others reported worse outcomes in men than women. The gender difference in the exclusion criteria in a diabetic stroke population is not fully understood. This issue was investigated in this study. Method In a diabetic stroke population from a stroke registry of data collected between January 2010 to June 30, 2016, the gender difference was determined using demographics and clinical factors. Comparison was determined using univariate analysis while multivariable model was used to adjust for the effect of confounding variables. Results In a diabetic stroke population of 439 patients, more females were excluded than males ( P < 0.0001, OR = 2.323). The male exclusion was associated with atrial fibrillation ( P = 0.011, OR = 3.697), carotid artery stenosis ( P = 0.023, OR = 5.001), and cholesterol reducer ( P = 0.037, OR = 0.409). In the female diabetic stroke population, exclusion from rtPA therapy was associated with language disturbances ( P = 0.039, OR = 0.372), history of previous stroke ( P = 0.005, OR = 3.276), antihypertensive medication use ( P = 0.013, OR = 0.163), and antidiabetic medication use ( P = 0.031, OR = 0.324). Conclusion In a stroke population, women have a worse outcome than men in an untreated acute ischemic stroke population, but when treated there is no significant difference, suggesting a better treatment outcome for women compared to men. In a diabetic stroke population, the clinical variables for the exclusion criteria for women and men are significantly different, even after adjustment for confounding variables.
机译:背景许多研究报告说,在使用rtPA的情况下,中风后幸存的女性的结局较男性差,而其他研究则报告男性的结局较女性差。糖尿病性卒中人群的排除标准中的性别差异尚不完全清楚。在本研究中对此问题进行了调查。方法从2010年1月至2016年6月30日收集的卒中数据中,对糖尿病卒中人群进行性别统计学分析,采用人口统计学和临床​​因素。比较使用单变量分析确定,而多变量模型用于调整混杂变量的影响。结果在439名糖尿病中风患者中,女性比男性多(P <0.0001,OR = 2.323)。男性排斥与房颤(P = 0.011,OR = 3.697),颈动脉狭窄(P = 0.023,OR = 5.001)和胆固醇降低剂(P = 0.037,OR = 0.409)相关。在女性糖尿病性卒中人群中,rtPA治疗被排除与语言障碍(P = 0.039,OR = 0.372),既往卒中史(P = 0.005,OR = 3.276),抗高血压药物的使用(P = 0.013,OR = 0.163)和抗糖尿病药物的使用(P = 0.031,OR = 0.324)。结论在中风人群中,在未经治疗的急性缺血性中风人群中,女性的病情比男性差,但治疗后无显着差异,表明女性比男性的治疗结果更好。在糖尿病性卒中人群中,即使在调整了混杂变量之后,男女排除标准的临床变量也存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号