首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences >Inclusion of incorrect information on snakebite first aid in school and university teaching materials in Nepal
【24h】

Inclusion of incorrect information on snakebite first aid in school and university teaching materials in Nepal

机译:在尼泊尔的学校和大学教材中包含有关蛇咬急救的错误信息

获取原文
       

摘要

In previous studies in Nepal, snakebite victims were found to either not have Pressure Immobilization Bandaging (PIB) or Local Compression Pad Immobilization (LCPI) performed for first aid, or had it performed incorrectly. The goal of this study was to evaluate training texts regarding first aid measures for snakebite and the rates of performance of both methods currently recommended, as well as ineffective or harmful practices. The study was conducted from September, 2009 to November, 2010. It evaluated the venomous snakebite first aid measures recommended in the 31 most recently published and commonly used Nepalese reference works and textbooks aimed at paramedical personnel, primary health care workers, medical undergraduates, and students of class five to bachelor′s degree. It compared the suggestions of these with those of published guidelines for the management of snakebite envenomation. Up to 100% of first aid measures advocated in these materials differed significantly from published guidelines. This included the omission of appropriate activities, misstatements and prescription of inappropriate treatments. Among appropriate recommendations that were missing was the advice to apply PIB or LCPI, and the suggestion to go to a snakebite treatment center. Fifty-five percent of the references did recommend emergency transport. Inclusion of accurate evidence-based information regarding first aid measures for venomous snakebite in commonly used texts could help to reduce the application of ineffective or harmful pre-hospital practices, their associated morbidity and mortality, and increase the use of appropriate methods.
机译:在尼泊尔的先前研究中,发现被蛇咬的受害者没有进行过急救的加压固定绷带(PIB)或局部加压固定板(LCPI),或者执行不正确。这项研究的目的是评估有关蛇咬急救措施的培训教材,目前推荐的两种方法的效果以及无效或有害的做法。该研究于2009年9月至2010年11月进行。该研究评估了31份最新发布的尼泊尔常用参考书和教科书中推荐的有毒蛇咬急救措施,这些参考书和书针对医疗人员,初级卫生保健工作者,医科大学生和五年级至学士学位的学生。它将这些建议与已发布的有关蛇咬毒液管理的指南进行了比较。这些材料中提倡的急救措施中,多达100%与已发布的指南有显着差异。这包括省略适当的活动,错误陈述和不适当治疗的处方。缺少的适当建议中包括使用PIB或LCPI的建议,以及去蛇咬治疗中心的建议。百分之五十五的参考文献确实建议紧急运输。在常用的案文中加入关于有毒蛇咬急救措施的准确的循证信息,可以帮助减少无效或有害的院前实践的使用,其相关的发病率和死亡率,并增加适当方法的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号