首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine >Application of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Final Assessment System in Sonography of Palpable Breast Lesions and Reconsideration of the Modified Triple Test
【24h】

Application of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Final Assessment System in Sonography of Palpable Breast Lesions and Reconsideration of the Modified Triple Test

机译:乳房成像报告和数据系统最终评估系统在可触及的乳房病变的超声检查中的应用以及改进的三重检验的重新考虑

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the utility of the American College of Radiology's Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) sonographic final assessment system and palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for evaluation of palpable breast lesions. Methods. Our computerized database identified 160 palpable lesions of the breast in which follow-up palpation-guided FNA, targeted sonography, and pathologic confirmation were performed. We used BI-RADS sonographic data on all lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of malignancy were calculated for sonography and palpation-guided FNA. Two-sample binomial proportion tests were used as the statistical analysis (P < .05). Results. The FNA results were defined as benign, atypical cells, suspicious for malignancy, malignancy, and insufficiency. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 90.9%, 82.7%, 84.3%, 57.7%, and 97.2%, respectively, on sonography and 75.8% to 90.9%, 82.7% to 98.4%, 84.3% to 94.4%, 57.7% to 92.6%, and 93.9% to 97.2% on FNA. There was no statistically significant difference for sensitivity and negative predictive value between the two examinations. Conclusions. The diagnostic accuracy of sonography was similar to that of palpation-guided FNA for not missing the malignancy. Clinical application of FNA results can be difficult, especially when the result is insufficiency or atypical cells. Moreover, FNA is invasive and overlaps other procedures. Therefore, we conclude that sonography can replace palpation-guided FNA for diagnosis of palpable lesions of the breast when the BI-RADS sonographic final assessment system is used appropriately.
机译:目的。我们研究的目的是评估美国放射学院的乳房成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)超声检查最终评估系统以及触诊引导的细针穿刺(FNA)评估可触及的乳房病变的实用性。方法。我们的计算机数据库确定了160个可触及的乳腺病变,在其中进行了后续触诊引导的FNA,定向超声检查和病理证实。我们在所有病变上均使用了BI-RADS超声检查数据。计算超声和触诊引导下的FNA的敏感性,特异性,准确性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。二样本二项式比例检验用作统计分析(P <.05)。结果。 FNA结果定义为良性,非典型细胞,可疑恶性,恶性和功能不全。超声检查的敏感性,特异性,准确性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为90.9%,82.7%,84.3%,57.7%和97.2%,超声检查的敏感性为75.8%至90.9%,82.7%至98.4%,84.3 FNA的百分比介于9%至94.4%,57.7%至92.6%和93.9%至97.2%。两次检查之间的敏感性和阴性预测值在统计学上没有显着差异。结论。超声检查的诊断准确性与未触及恶性肿瘤的触诊引导FNA相似。 FNA结果的临床应用可能很困难,尤其是当结果不足或细胞异常时。此外,FNA具有侵入性,并且与其他程序重叠。因此,我们得出结论,当适当使用BI-RADS超声检查最终评估系统时,超声检查可以代替触诊引导的FNA来诊断乳房可触及的病变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号