首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Korean Chemical Society >The Influences of Cognitive Conflict, Situational Interest, and Learning Process Variables on Conceptual Change in Cognitive Conflict Strategy with an Alternative Hypothesis
【24h】

The Influences of Cognitive Conflict, Situational Interest, and Learning Process Variables on Conceptual Change in Cognitive Conflict Strategy with an Alternative Hypothesis

机译:认知冲突,情境兴趣和学习过程变量对具有替代假设的认知冲突策略中概念变化的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

In this study, we investigated the influences of cognitive conflict and situational interest induced by a discrepant event and an alternative hypothesis, attention and state learning strategies on conceptual change. A preconception test was administered to 486 seventh graders. They also completed the questionnaires of cognitive response and situational interest to a discrepant event before/after presenting an alternative hypothesis. After learning the concept of density with a CAI program as conceptual change intervention, the tests of attention, state learning strategies, and conceptual understanding were administered as posttests. Analyses of the results for 197 students having misconceptions about density revealed that post-cognitive conflict was significantly higher than pre-cognitive conflict. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the test scores of pre-situational interest and post-situational interest. Pre-cognitive conflict only exerted a direct effect on post-cognitive conflict, while post-cognitive conflict exerted a direct effect and Journal of the Korean Chemical Society an indirect effect via attention on conceptual understanding. Both pre- and post-situational interests were found to influence on conceptual understanding via attention. Attention had influences positively on deep learning strategy and negatively on surface learning strategy. There was a relatively small effect of state learning strategies on conceptual understanding.
机译:在这项研究中,我们调查了由差异事件引起的认知冲突和情境兴趣的影响,以及替代假设,注意力和状态学习策略对概念变化的影响。对486个七年级学生进行了孕前测试。在提出替代假设之前/之后,他们还完成了对差异事件的认知反应和情境兴趣的问卷。在通过CAI程序作为概念变化干预来学习密度的概念后,将注意力,状态学习策略和概念理解的测试作为后测进行管理。对197名对密度有误解的学生进行的分析结果显示,认知后冲突明显高于认知前冲突。但是,情境兴趣和情境兴趣的测试分数之间没有统计学上的显着差异。认知前冲突仅对认知后冲突产生直接影响,而认知后冲突则通过对概念理解的关注而产生直接影响,《韩国化学学会杂志》则具有间接影响。发现情境前后的兴趣都通过注意力影响概念理解。注意对深度学习策略有正面影响,而对表面学习策略则有负面影响。状态学习策略对概念理解的影响相对较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号