首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: JCMA >Lamotrigine for trigeminal neuralgia: Efficacy and safety in comparison with carbamazepine
【24h】

Lamotrigine for trigeminal neuralgia: Efficacy and safety in comparison with carbamazepine

机译:拉莫三嗪治疗三叉神经痛:与卡马西平相比疗效和安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Anticonvulsants are regarded as useful for the treatment of neuropathic pain. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and occurrence of side effects of lamotrigine (LTG) in comparison with carbamazepine (CBZ), in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients. Methods: The study was an interventional and crossover comparison. Twenty-one patients with TN were administered with LTG in comparison to CBZ. The clinical trials comprised two phases of 40 days each, with an intervening three-day washout period. The final titration in dose for LTG was 400?mg and 1,200?mg for CBZ. Efficacy of the medications involved was determined by visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). Side effects were recorded through marking of the profiles of side effects encountered on administration of LTG and CBZ, together with baseline haematological, hepatic and renal investigations. Results: Both on VAS and VRS assessments, in terms of proportion of patients, CBZ benefitted 90.5% (19/21) of the patients with pain relief (p??0.05). Meanwhile, LTG inflicted 14% (3/21) of the patients with haematological, hepatic and renal derangements, as compared with 48% (10/21) on CBZ. Conclusion: LTG is generally an effective and safe treatment for management of TN, compared to CBZ.
机译:背景:抗惊厥药被认为可用于治疗神经性疼痛。在这项研究中,我们评估了在三叉神经痛(TN)患者中与卡马西平(CBZ)相比,拉莫三嗪(LTG)的疗效和副作用的发生。方法:本研究是一项干预和交叉比较。与CBZ相比,二十一例TN的患者接受了LTG的治疗。临床试验包括两个阶段,每个阶段40天,中间有3天的清除期。 LTG的最终滴定剂量为400?mg,CBZ的最终滴定为1200?mg。所涉及药物的疗效由视觉模拟量表(VAS)和口头评价量表(VRS)确定。通过标记在施用LTG和CBZ时遇到的副作用概况以及基线血液学,肝脏和肾脏检查来记录副作用。结果:在VAS和VRS评估中,就患者比例而言,CBZ使疼痛缓解的患者受益90.5%(19/21)(p <0.05),而在缓解疼痛的患者中则为62%(13/21)。 LTG。在VAS评估中,从LTG止痛的13例患者和从CBZ止痛的13例患者中,有77%(10/13)从LTG止痛“完全”缓解,而从CBZ获得21%(4/19) 。在VRS评估中,LTG可使84%(11/13)的患者疼痛缓解程度“好得多”,而CBZ则为26%(5/19)。在LTG上,有67%(14/21)的患者忍受了一般的药理副作用,而在CBZ上有57%(12/21)的患者(p≥0.05)。同时,LTG导致血液学,肝病和肾病患者的比例为14%(3/21),而CBZ患者为48%(10/21)。结论:与CBZ相比,LTG通常是一种有效且安全的TN管理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号