...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of postgraduate medicine. >Pre-injury neuro-psychiatric medication use, alone or in combination with cardiac medications, may affect outcomes in trauma patients
【24h】

Pre-injury neuro-psychiatric medication use, alone or in combination with cardiac medications, may affect outcomes in trauma patients

机译:单独或与心脏药物结合使用损伤前神经精神科药物可能会影响创伤患者的预后

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Recent review of older (≥45-years-old) patients admitted to our trauma center showed that more than one-third were using neuro-psychiatric medications (NPMs) prior to their injury-related admission. Previously published data suggests that use of NPMs may increase patients' risk and severity of injury. We sought to examine the impact of pre-injury NPM use on older trauma patients' morbidity and mortality. Materials and Methods: Retrospective record review included medication regimen characteristics and NPM use (antidepressants-AD, antipsychotics-AP, anxiolytics-AA). Hospital morbidity, mortality, and 90-day survival were examined. Comparisons included regimens involving NPMs, further focusing on their interactions with various cardiac medications (beta blocker - BB; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker - ACE/ARB; calcium channel blocker - CCB). Results: 712 patient records were reviewed (399 males, mean age 63.5 years, median ISS 8). 245 patients were taking at least 1 NPM: AD (158), AP (35), or AA (108) before injury. There was no effect of NPM monotherapy on hospital mortality. Patients taking ≥3 NPMs had significantly lower 90-day survival compared to patients taking ≤2 NPMs (81% for 3 or more NPMs, 95% for no NPMs, and 89% 1-2 NPMs, P < 0.01). Several AD-cardiac medication (CM) combinations were associated with increased mortality compared to monotherapy with either agent (BB-AD 14.7% mortality versus 7.0% for AD monotherapy or 4.8% BB monotherapy, P < 0.05). Combinations of ACE/ARB-AA were associated with increased mortality compared to ACE/ARB monotherapy (11.5% vs 4.9, P = 0.04). Finally, ACE/ARB-AD co-administration had higher mortality than ACE/ARB monotherapy (13.5% vs 4.9%, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Large proportion of older trauma patients was using pre-injury NPMs. Several regimens involving NPMs and CMs were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Additionally, use of ≥3 NPMs was associated with lower 90-day survival.
机译:背景:最近对入院创伤中心的老年患者(≥45岁)进行的最新审查显示,超过三分之一的患者在与损伤相关的入院前使用了神经精神药物(NPM)。先前发表的数据表明,使用NPM可能会增加患者的风险和受伤的严重程度。我们试图检查损伤前NPM的使用对老年创伤患者的发病率和死亡率的影响。材料和方法:回顾性记录回顾包括药物治疗方案特征和NPM使用(抗抑郁药-AD,抗精神病药-AP,抗焦虑药-AA)。检查医院的发病率,死亡率和90天生存率。比较包括涉及NPM的方案,进一步侧重于它们与各种心脏药物的相互作用(β受体阻滞剂-BB;血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂-ACE / ARB;钙通道阻滞剂-CCB)。结果:审查了712例患者记录(399例男性,平均年龄63.5岁,中位ISS 8)。 245例患者在受伤前至少接受1 NPM:AD(158),AP(35)或AA(108)。 NPM单一疗法对医院死亡率没有影响。与接受≤2 NPM的患者相比,接受≥3 NPM的患者的90天生存率显着降低(3个或更多NPM的患者为81%,无NPM的患者为95%,1-2 NPM的患者为89%,P <0.01)。与任何一种药物的单药治疗相比,几种AD心脏药物(CM)组合与死亡率增加相关(BB-AD死亡率为14.7%,而AD单药或4.8%BB单药为7.0%,P <0.05)。与ACE / ARB单药治疗相比,ACE / ARB-AA组合与死亡率增加相关(11.5%vs 4.9,P = 0.04)。最后,ACE / ARB-AD共同给药的死亡率高于ACE / ARB单药治疗(13.5%比4.9%,P = 0.01)。结论:大部分老年创伤患者使用的是损伤前NPM。涉及NPM和CM的几种方案与院内死亡率增加相关。另外,使用≥3NPM与较低的90天生存期有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号