...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Quantum Information Science >Reply to “Comments on ‘There Is No Axiomatic System for the Quantum Theory’”
【24h】

Reply to “Comments on ‘There Is No Axiomatic System for the Quantum Theory’”

机译:答复“关于“没有公理系统的量子理论”的评论”

获取原文

摘要

Barros discusses that [Jose Acacio de Barros, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50, 1828 (2011)] Nagata derives inconsistencies from quantum mechanics [K. Nagata, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 3532 (2009)]. Barros considers that the inconsistencies do not come from quantum mechanics, but from extra assumptions about the reality of observables. Here we discuss the fact that there is a contradiction within the quantum theory. We discuss the fact that only one expected value in a spin-1/2 pure state 〈σx〉rules out the reality of the observable. We do not accept extra assumptions about the reality of observables. We use the actually measured results of quantum measurements (raw data). We use a single Pauli observable. We stress that we can use the quantum theory even if we give up the axiomatic system for the quantum theory.
机译:Barros讨论了[Jose Acacio de Barros,国际J.理论。物理50,1828(2011)] Nagata从量子力学中得出了矛盾之处。长田市(Int。) J.理论。物理48,3532(2009)]。 Barros认为不一致之处并非来自量子力学,而是来自关于可观察物现实的额外假设。在这里,我们讨论了量子理论内部存在矛盾的事实。我们讨论了一个事实,即在自旋1/2纯态(σx)中只有一个期望值排除了可观察的事实。我们不接受有关可观察物现实的额外假设。我们使用量子测量的实际测量结果(原始数据)。我们使用单个Pauli观测值。我们强调,即使我们放弃了量子理论的公理体系,我们也可以使用量子理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号