首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research >‘‘Can I drop it this time?’’ Gender and Collaborative Group Dynamics in an Engineering Design-Based Afterschool Program
【24h】

‘‘Can I drop it this time?’’ Gender and Collaborative Group Dynamics in an Engineering Design-Based Afterschool Program

机译:“'这次我可以放弃吗?'基于工程设计的课后计划中的性别和协作小组动态

获取原文
       

摘要

The 21st century has brought an increasing demand for expertise in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Although strides have been made towards increasing gender diversity in several of these disciplines, engineering remains primarily male dominated. In response, the U.S. educational system has attempted to make engineering curriculum more engaging, informative, and welcoming to girls. Specifically, project-based and design-based learning pedagogies promise to make engineering interesting and accessible for girls while enculturating them into the world of engineering and scientific inquiry. Outcomes for girls learning in these contexts have been mixed. The purpose of this study was to explore how cultural gender norms are navigated within informal K-12 engineering contexts. We analyzed video of single- and mixed-gender collaborative groups participating in Studio STEM, a design-based, environmentally themed afterschool program that took place in a rural community. Discourse analysis was used to interpret interactional styles within and across groups. Discrepancies were found regarding functional and cultural characteristics of groups based on gender composition. Single-gender groups adhered more closely to social gender norms. For example, the boys group was characterized by overt hierarchies, whereas the girls group outwardly displayed solidarity and collaboration. In contrast, characteristics of interactional styles within mixed gender groups strayed from social gender norms, and stylistic differences across group types were greater for girls than for boys. Learning outcomes indicated that girls learned more in mixed-gender groups. Our results support the use of mixed-gender collaborative learning groups in engineering education yet uncover several challenges. We close with a discussion of implications for practitioners.
机译:21世纪对科学,技术,工程和数学(STEM)的专业知识提出了越来越高的要求。尽管在其中一些学科中已在增加性别多样性方面取得了长足进步,但工程学仍然主要是男性主导。作为回应,美国的教育系统试图使工程课程对女孩更具吸引力,信息量和欢迎程度。具体而言,基于项目和基于设计的学习方法有望使工程学对女孩变得有趣且易于使用,同时将其培养到工程学和科学探究的世界中。在这些情况下,女孩学习的结果好坏参半。这项研究的目的是探索如何在非正式的K-12工程环境中引导文化性别规范。我们分析了参加Studio STEM的单性别和混合性别协作小组的视频,该项目是在农村社区中进行的,基于设计的,以环境为主题的课外活动。话语分析用于解释群体内部和群体之间的互动方式。发现基于性别组成的群体的功能和文化特征存在差异。单一性别群体更加遵守社会性别规范。例如,男孩组的特征是明显的等级制度,而女孩组的外部表现出团结和协作。相比之下,混合性别群体内的互动风格特征却偏离了社会性别规范,而女孩之间的群体间风格差异更大。学习成果表明,女孩在混合性别群体中学到了更多。我们的研究结果支持在工程教育中使用混合性别协作学习小组,但发现了一些挑战。最后,我们讨论了对从业者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号