首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology >Economic and productivity evaluation of different horizontal drilling scenarios: Middle East oil fields as case study
【24h】

Economic and productivity evaluation of different horizontal drilling scenarios: Middle East oil fields as case study

机译:不同水平钻井场景的经济和生产率评估:以中东油田为例

获取原文
       

摘要

Development of high-density oil and gas fields presents a great challenge to the energy industry due to the low productivity of individual wells and their high drilling cost. We thus compared the productivity, associated costs and economical revenues gained from two field development scenarios, with multilateral and horizontal drilling, to evaluate the optimal drilling and completion conditions in a giant heavy oil reservoir in the Middle East. Well path design was identified as one of the most complex parameters depending on the well-testing results, field production and reservoir simulation data. The fishbone well of four branches with a length of 300?m each and 30° deviation from the main hole was identified to be drilled and completed using open-hole sidetrack as the best approach. The fishbone structure raised production by 393%, while drilling cost only increased by 130% compared with a conventional horizontal well.
机译:高密度油气田的开发对能源行业提出了巨大的挑战,因为单个井的生产率低且钻井成本高。因此,我们比较了在多边和水平钻井两个现场开发方案中获得的生产率,相关成本和经济收入,以评估中东一个巨大的稠油油藏的最佳钻井和完井条件。根据试井结果,现场生产和油藏模拟数据,井道设计被认为是最复杂的参数之一。四个分支的鱼骨井各有300?m的长度,并且与主孔的偏差为30°,这被确定为最好的方法,使用裸眼侧钻来钻完。与传统的水平井相比,鱼骨结构使产量提高了393%,而钻井成本仅增加了130%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号