首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pathology Informatics >Clinical fellowship training in pathology informatics: A program description
【24h】

Clinical fellowship training in pathology informatics: A program description

机译:病理学信息学的临床研究金培训:程序说明

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:In 2007, our healthcare system established a clinical fellowship program in pathology informatics. In 2011, the program benchmarked its structure and operations against a 2009 white paper “Program requirements for fellowship education in the subspecialty of clinical informatics”, endorsed by the Board of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) that described a proposal for a general clinical informatics fellowship program.Methods:A group of program faculty members and fellows compared each of the proposed requirements in the white paper with the fellowship program's written charter and operations. The majority of white paper proposals aligned closely with the rules and activities in our program and comparison was straightforward. In some proposals, however, differences in terminology, approach, and philosophy made comparison less direct, and in those cases, the thinking of the group was recorded. After the initial evaluation, the remainder of the faculty reviewed the results and any disagreements were resolved.Results:The most important finding of the study was how closely the white paper proposals for a general clinical informatics fellowship program aligned with the reality of our existing pathology informatics fellowship. The program charter and operations of the program were judged to be concordant with the great majority of specific white paper proposals. However, there were some areas of discrepancy and the reasons for the discrepancies are discussed in the manuscript.Conclusions:After the comparison, we conclude that the existing pathology informatics fellowship could easily meet all substantive proposals put forth in the 2009 clinical informatics program requirements white paper. There was also agreement on a number of philosophical issues, such as the advantages of multiple fellows, the need for core knowledge and skill sets, and the need to maintain clinical skills during informatics training. However, there were other issues, such as a requirement for a 2-year fellowship and for informatics fellowships to be done after primary board certification, that pathology should consider carefully as it moves toward a subspecialty status and board certification.
机译:背景:2007年,我们的医疗保健系统建立了病理学信息学的临床研究金计划。 2011年,该计划根据2009年白皮书“临床信息学亚专业的进修教育计划要求”对它的结构和运营进行了基准测试,该白皮书得到了美国医学信息学协会(AMIA)理事会的认可,该白皮书描述了一项针对一般临床的建议方法:一组计划的教职员工和研究人员将白皮书中的每个拟议要求与研究计划的书面章程和操作进行了比较。大部分白皮书提案都与我们计划中的规则和活动紧密一致,并且比较简单。但是,在某些建议中,术语,方法和哲学上的差异使比较不那么直接,在这种情况下,记录了小组的想法。经过初步评估,其余教师对该结果进行了审查,并解决了任何分歧。结果:该研究最重要的发现是针对一般临床信息学研究金计划的白皮书提案与我们现有病理学的现实情况紧密相关信息学研究金。计划章程和计划的运作被认为与大多数特定的白皮书提案一致。结论:比较后,我们得出结论,现有的病理学信息学研究金可以轻松满足2009年临床信息学计划要求中提出的所有实质性建议。纸。在许多哲学问题上也达成了共识,例如多位研究员的优势,对核心知识和技能的需求以及在信息学培训期间保持临床技能的需求。但是,还有其他问题,例如要求获得2年研究金和要求获得初级董事会认证后进行的信息学研究金,病理学在朝着获得专科地位和董事会认证的方向应谨慎考虑。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号