首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare >Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: a systematic review of guidelines, tools, standards of practice, best practices, consensus statements and systematic reviews
【24h】

Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: a systematic review of guidelines, tools, standards of practice, best practices, consensus statements and systematic reviews

机译:减少医疗机构中与艾滋病相关的污名和歧视:对指南,工具,实践标准,最佳实践,共识声明和系统评价的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Policy makers and health professionals prefer to use preappraised and summarized evidence. Stigma and discrimination (SAD) reduction activities and programs are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to people living with HIV and the success of HIV-related prevention, care and treatment programs. The objective of this review was to identify and describe systematic reviews, best practices, consensus statements, standards of practice and guidelines that addressed SAD among healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: All documents in the form of systematic reviews, best practices, consensus statements, standards of practice and guidelines were considered for inclusion. The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies reported in English with unlimited date range in Excerpta Medica Database from Elsevier (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Psychological Information (PsycINFO) database and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE). Websites of organizations and guideline databases were also searched. Two individuals independently appraised the quality of the documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE?II) checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews. Data extraction was done using a customized tool that was developed to record the key information of the source that is relevant to the review question. Results: Twelve records (six guideline-related documents and six systematic reviews) were included in the review. Interventions and recommendations developed to reduce HIV-related SAD were categorized into information-based, structural, biomedical, counseling and support, skills building and contact interventions. Conclusion: Implications for practice: Interventions that reduce HIV-related SAD are broadly categorized into information-based, structural, biomedical, counseling and support, skills building and contact interventions. Because of limited methodological description of the included documents, it was difficult to draw recommendations for policy and practice. Implications for research: Future studies need to use up-to-date instruments to measure SAD. Further studies of greater methodological quality are needed. Guidelines, tools and best practice documents that aim to reduce HIV-related SAD should be developed with the considerations of research evidence on the specific setting and specific targeted populations.
机译:简介:政策制定者和卫生专业人员更喜欢使用预先评估和总结的证据。需要减少耻​​辱感和歧视(SAD)活动和计划,以提高向艾滋病毒携带者提供的护理质量以及与艾滋病毒有关的预防,护理和治疗计划的成功。此次审查的目的是识别和描述针对医护人员(HCW)中SAD的系统评价,最佳实践,共识声明,实践标准和指南。方法:所有以系统评价,最佳实践,共识声明,实践标准和指南形式出现的文件均被考虑纳入。该搜索策略旨在在Elsevier(EMBASE)的Excerpta Medica数据库,护理和专职健康累积指数(CINAHL),心理信息(PsycINFO)数据库以及医学文献分析和医学文献分析中查找以英语报告的无限制日期范围的已发表和未发表的研究。在线检索系统(MEDLINE)。还搜索了组织的网站和指南数据库。两个人使用《研究与评估指南评估》(AGREE?II)清单和乔安娜·布里格斯学院的关键评估清单对系统质量进行了独立评估。数据提取是使用定制工具完成的,该工具开发用于记录与审阅问题相关的来源的关键信息。结果:12条记录(6条与指南相关的文件和6条系统评价)被包括在评价中。为减少与艾滋病毒有关的SAD而制定的干预措施和建议,分为基于信息的,结构性的,生物医学的,咨询和支持的,技能建设的和接触干预措施。结论:对实践的意义:减少艾滋病毒相关SAD的干预措施大致分为基于信息的,结构性的,生物医学的,咨询和支持的,技能建设的和接触干预措施。由于对所含文件的方法描述有限,因此很难为政策和实践提出建议。研究的意义:未来的研究需要使用最新的仪器来测量SAD。需要对方法学质量进行进一步研究。旨在减少与艾滋病毒有关的SAD的指导方针,工具和最佳实践文件,应考虑有关特定环境和特定目标人群的研究证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号