...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences >Intrathecal 0.75% Isobaric Ropivacaine Versus 0.5% Heavy Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Intrathecal 0.75% Isobaric Ropivacaine Versus 0.5% Heavy Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:鞘内注射0.75%等压罗哌卡因与0.5%重型布比卡因用于选择性剖宫产:一项随机对照试验

获取原文

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Ropivacaine, a local anesthetic with duration of action of 2-3 hours, has shown greater selectivity for sensory blockade along with lower systemic toxicity as compared to bupivacaine when used for spinal anesthesia. This study was aimed to compare the intrathecal efficacy and safety of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine for cesarean delivery with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine in parturients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 46 parturients of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I-II scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia for this prospective randomized control trial. The patients were randomized to receive either 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 24 mg of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine intrathecally. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, characteristics of sensory and motor nerve block, neonatal outcome and maternal adverse effect (such as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, shivering or pruritis) were evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline demographic variables were similar in the 2 groups (p-value>0.05). Neonatal outcomes were also similar in both the groups. The time to achieve sensory block to T10 (3.2 ± 1.5 vs 2.5 ± 1.3 minutes) or to the maximal level (9.8 ± 3.1 vs 7.9 ± 2.3 minutes) was longer in the ropivacaine group (p-value 0.048) but the median maximal level of sensory block was similar between the two groups (p-value>0.05). Duration of sensory block was shorter in the ropivacaine group (160.5± 22.2 vs 182.3± 30.5 minutes) (p-value 0.03). Duration of motor block was also significantly shorter than bupivacaine group (112.5 ± 45 vs 165.3 ± 26) (p-value 0.004). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery with intrathecal 24 mg of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine provided clinically effective surgical anesthesia of shorter duration without compromising neonatal outcome and can be used as an effective and safe alternative to bupivacaine.
机译:目的:与布比卡因相比,罗比卡因是一种局部麻醉药,作用时间为2-3小时,与布比卡因相比,对感觉障碍的选择性更高,且全身毒性更低。本研究旨在比较0.75%异巴比罗哌卡因与0.5%重度布比卡因在剖腹产中的鞘内疗效和安全性。材料与方法:我们纳入了46位ASA(美国麻醉医师学会)I-II级产妇,该产妇计划在该前瞻性随机对照试验中进行脊髓麻醉下的选择性剖宫产。患者随机接受鞘内注射12.5 mg 0.5%的高压布比卡因或24 mg 0.75%的同量异位罗哌卡因。评估术中血流动力学参数,感觉神经和运动神经阻滞的特征,新生儿结局和母亲的不良反应(如低血压,心动过缓,恶心,呕吐,发抖或瘙痒)。结果:两组的基线人口统计学变量相似(p值> 0.05)。两组的新生儿结局也相似。罗哌卡因组达到T10感官阻滞的时间(3.2±1.5 vs 2.5±1.3分钟)或达到最高水平(9.8±3.1 vs 7.9±2.3分钟)的时间更长(p值0.048),但中位最大水平两组之间的感觉阻滞相似(p值> 0.05)。罗哌卡因组感觉阻滞持续时间较短(160.5±22.2 vs 182.3±30.5分钟)(p值0.03)。运动障碍的持续时间也明显短于布比卡因组(112.5±45对165.3±26)(p值0.004)。结论:脊髓麻醉用于选择性剖宫产,鞘内注射24 mg 0.75%异巴比罗哌卡因可在较短的时间内提供临床有效的手术麻醉,而不会影响新生儿的结局,可作为布比卡因的一种安全有效的替代选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号