首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oral Science >Wear characteristics of polished and glazed lithium disilicate ceramics opposed to three ceramic materials
【24h】

Wear characteristics of polished and glazed lithium disilicate ceramics opposed to three ceramic materials

机译:与三种陶瓷材料相对的抛光和釉面二硅酸锂陶瓷的磨损特性

获取原文
           

摘要

This study compared the wear characteristics of a heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramic material opposed to feldspathic porcelain, a lithium disilicate glass ceramic, and zirconia materials. Ceramic plate specimens were prepared from feldspathic porcelain (EX-3 nA1B), lithium disilicate glass ceramics (e.max CAD MO1/C14), and zirconia (Katana KT 10) and then ground or polished. Rounded rod specimens were fabricated from heat-pressed lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max press LT A3) and then glazed or polished. A sliding wear testing apparatus was used for wear testing. Wear of glazed rods was greater than that of polished rods when they were abraded with ground zirconia, ground porcelain, polished porcelain, or polished lithium disilicate ceramics. For both glazed and polished rods, wear was greater when the rods were abraded with ground plates. The findings indicate that application of a polished surface rather than a glazed surface is recommended for single restorations made of heat-pressed lithium disilicate material. In addition, care must be taken when polishing opposing materials, especially those used in occlusal contact areas. (J Oral Sci 58, 117-123, 2016)
机译:这项研究比较了与长石瓷,二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷和氧化锆材料相对的热压二硅酸锂陶瓷材料的磨损特性。用长石瓷(EX-3 nA1B),二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(例如max CAD MO1 / C14)和氧化锆(Katana KT 10)制备陶瓷板标本,然后研磨或抛光。用热压二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(例如max press LT A3)制成圆棒样品,然后上釉或抛光。使用滑动磨损测试设备进行磨损测试。当用磨碎的氧化锆,磨碎的瓷器,磨光的瓷器或磨光的二硅酸锂陶瓷磨光时,磨光的棒的磨损大于磨光的棒。对于上光的和抛光的杆,当用接地板研磨杆时,磨损会更大。研究结果表明,对于由热压二硅酸锂材料制成的单个修复体,建议使用抛光表面而非玻璃表面。另外,在抛光相对的材料时,尤其是在咬合接触区域使用的材料时,必须小心。 (J Oral Sci 58,117-123,2016)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号