首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Research >Analysis of the stress distribution of the subtalar joint and fusion efficacy after double-screw insertion
【24h】

Analysis of the stress distribution of the subtalar joint and fusion efficacy after double-screw insertion

机译:双螺钉插入后距下关节应力分布及融合疗效分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Screw fixation is a typical technique for the isolated subtalar joint. However, no consensus has been reached on how to select the most suitable insertion position and direction. This study aims to find the ideal screw insertion and then explore its influence on the clinical efficacy of subtalar fusion by analyzing the effects of different cannulated screw insertions on the stress distribution, anti-rotary strength, and anti-inversion/eversion strength of the subtalar joint. Methods In this study, we investigated three cannulated screw insertions for subtalar fusion: screw insertion with the most uniform stress distribution (group A), lateral-medial parallel screw insertion (group B), and traditional longitudinally parallel screw insertion (group C). The effects of these three insertions on the loading stress of the subtalar joint (including stress distribution, anti-inversion/eversion strength, and anti-rotary strength) were comparatively analyzed with the three-dimensional finite element method to screen the ideal screw insertion. Moreover, a prospective study was conducted to analyze the influence of the ideal screw insertion on subtalar fusion, including the fusion rate, fusion time, and clinical efficacy (VAS score, AOFAS score, and complications). Results Group B was worse than group A with respect to the stress distribution uniformity, but slightly better than group C, and better than both groups A and C in terms of the anti-rotary strength and anti-inversion/eversion strength. The screw insertion based on the most uniform stress distribution is not feasible in surgery. Therefore, the lateral-medial antiparallel screw insertion is the ideal insertion. From January 2012 to June 2016, 48 cases were treated by subtalar fusion with the ideal screw insertion, and then followed up for 30.6?months (12–48?months). The fusion was proved in all 48 cases with a fusion rate of 100% by X-ray or CT scan. The mean time of fusion was 12.8?weeks (12–16?weeks). The VAS score decreased from 6.00 before operation to 1.03 on the last visit ( P ?0.05), and the AOFAS score increased from 57.0 to 85.6 ( P ?0.05), with a good and excellent rate of 95.8%. Conclusions The lateral-medial parallel screw insertion not only demonstrates a good stress distribution profile of the subtalar joint but also has advantages such as easy localization and operation during surgery, as well as a high fusion rate and few complications after surgery. Therefore, it is a safe, accurate, and effective fixation mode that is worthy of being popularized clinically.
机译:背景技术螺钉固定是孤立距下关节的典型技术。但是,关于如何选择最合适的插入位置和方向尚未达成共识。本研究旨在找到理想的螺钉插入物,然后通过分析不同空心螺钉插入物对距骨下应力分布,抗旋转强度和抗反转/反转强度的影响,找到理想的螺钉插入物,然后探讨其对距下融合的临床疗效的影响。联合。方法在本研究中,我们研究了三种用于距下融合的空心螺钉插入物:应力分布最均匀的螺钉插入物(A组),横向-中间平行螺钉插入物(B组)和传统的纵向平行螺钉插入物(C组)。用三维有限元方法比较分析了这三种插入方式对距下关节负荷应力的影响(包括应力分布,抗倒转强度和抗旋转强度),以筛选理想的螺钉插入方式。此外,进行了一项前瞻性研究,以分析理想螺钉插入对距下融合的影响,包括融合率,融合时间和临床疗效(VAS评分,AOFAS评分和并发症)。结果在应力分布均匀性方面,B组比A组差,但在抗旋转强度和抗倒转/反转强度方面均优于C组,也优于A组和C组。基于最均匀应力分布的螺钉插入在手术中不可行。因此,外侧-内侧反平行螺钉插入是理想的插入。从2012年1月至2016年6月,采用理想的螺钉插入距下融合治疗48例,随后随访30.6个月(12-48个月)。 X射线或CT扫描证实融合全部48例,融合率100%。融合的平均时间为12.8周(12-16周)。 VAS评分从手术前的6.00降低至上次就诊时的1.03(P <?0.05),AOFAS评分从57.0升高至85.6(P <?0.05),优良率为95.8%。结论外侧-内侧平行螺钉置入不仅显示距下颌关节良好的应力分布,而且具有易于在手术过程中定位和操作,融合率高,术后并发症少等优点。因此,这是一种安全,准确,有效的固定方式,值得临床推广。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号