...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Comparing common reasons for inpatient and outpatient visits between commercially-insured duloxetine or pregabalin initiators with fibromyalgia
【24h】

Comparing common reasons for inpatient and outpatient visits between commercially-insured duloxetine or pregabalin initiators with fibromyalgia

机译:比较商业保险的度洛西汀或普瑞巴林引发剂与纤维肌痛患者住院和门诊的常见原因

获取原文

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the main reasons for inpatient or outpatient visits after initiating duloxetine or pregabalin.Methods: Commercially insured patients with fibromyalgia and aged 18–64 years who initiated duloxetine or pregabalin in 2006 with 12-month continuous enrollment before and after initiation were identified. Duloxetine and pregabalin cohorts with similar demographics, pre-index clinical and economic characteristics, and pre-index treatment patterns were constructed via propensity scoring stratification. Reasons for inpatient admissions, physician office visits, outpatient hospital visits, emergency room visits, and primary or specialty care visits over the 12 months post-index period were examined and compared. Logistic regression was used to assess the contribution of duloxetine versus pregabalin initiation to the most common reasons for visits, controlling for cross-cohort differences.Results: Per the study design, the duloxetine (n = 3711) and pregabalin (n = 4111) cohorts had similar demographics (mean age 51 years, 83% female) and health care costs over the 12-month pre-index period. Total health care costs during the 12-month post-index period were significantly lower for duloxetine patients than for pregabalin patients ($19,378 versus $27,045, P < 0.05). Eight of the 10 most common reasons for inpatient admissions and outpatient hospital (physician office, emergency room, primary or specialty care) visits were the same for both groups. Controlling for cross-cohort differences, duloxetine patients were less likely to be hospitalized due to an intervertebral disc disorder or major depressive disorder, to have a physician office visit due to nonspecific backache/other backeck pain (NB/OB/NP) disorder, or to go to specialty care due to a soft tissue, NB/OP/NP, or intervertebral disc disorder. However, duloxetine patients were more likely to have a primary care visit due to a soft tissue disorder, essential hypertension, or other general symptoms.Conclusion: Among similar commercially insured patients with fibromyalgia who initiated duloxetine or pregabalin, duloxetine patients had significantly lower health care costs over the 12-month post-index period. The leading reasons for inpatient or outpatient visits were also somewhat different.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是探讨开始度洛西汀或普瑞巴林治疗后住院或门诊就诊的主要原因。方法:商业保险的纤维肌痛患者,年龄18-64岁,于2006年开始使用度洛西汀或普瑞巴林治疗,连续入选12个月确定启动之前和之后。通过倾向评分分层,建立了具有相似人口统计学,预指数临床和经济特征以及预指数治疗模式的度洛西汀和普瑞巴林队列。在索引期后的12个月内,检查并比较了住院患者入院,医生就诊,门诊医院就诊,急诊室就诊以及初级或专科护理就诊的原因。 Logistic回归用于评估度洛西汀和普瑞巴林起始对访问的最常见原因的贡献,控制跨队列差异。结果:根据研究设计,度洛西汀(n = 3711)和普瑞巴林(n = 4111)队列在指标前的12个月内,他们的人口统计特征相似(平均年龄51岁,女性83%)和医疗保健费用。度洛西汀患者在索引后的12个月内的总医疗保健费用显着低于普瑞巴林患者(19,378美元对27,045美元,P <0.05)。两组住院患者和门诊医院(内科,急诊室,初级或专科护理)最常见的10个原因中有8个是相同的。为了控制跨人群差异,度洛西汀患者因椎间盘疾病或重度抑郁症而住院的可能性较小,由于非特异性背痛/其他背/颈痛(NB / OB / NP)疾病而去医生就诊,或由于软组织,NB / OP / NP或椎间盘疾病而要接受专科护理。然而,由于软组织疾病,原发性高血压或其他一般症状,度洛西汀患者更有可能接受初级保健就诊。结论:在开始使用度洛西汀或普瑞巴林治疗的类似商业保险的纤维肌痛患者中,度洛西汀患者的医疗保健水平明显较低索引期12个月内的费用。住院或门诊就诊的主要原因也有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号