首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Effects of propofol anesthesia versus sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative pain after radical gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effects of propofol anesthesia versus sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative pain after radical gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial

机译:异丙酚麻醉与七氟醚麻醉对胃癌根治术后术后疼痛的影响:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: After a radical gastrectomy, patients may experience severe pain. Some studies have reported that the use of propofol significantly reduced postoperative pain, while others have argued that this effect was not significant. Thus, we aimed to assess whether anesthesia with propofol could help to reduce pain after an open radical gastrectomy procedure. Patients and methods: Sixty patients who were scheduled to undergo a laparotomy for radical gastrectomy were randomly assigned to either the propofol or sevoflurane group (n=30 each). A target-controlled infusion of propofol or inhalation of sevoflurane, titrated to bispectral index of 40–60, was maintained. All patients were administered a standardized multimodal analgesic plan, including intraoperative dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and postoperative flurbiprofen axetil, as well as patient-controlled fentanyl. Hemodynamics, pain scores, fentanyl consumption, adverse events, and the incidence of chronic pain 1 month and 3 months following hospital discharge were recorded. Results: The intensity of postoperative pain was relatively low to moderate in all the patients. The propofol group showed lower pain scores, at rest and while coughing, up to 48 h postoperatively compared to the sevoflurane group ( P <0.05). Cumulative fentanyl consumption 0–24 h after surgery was lower for the propofol group (364.4 ± 139.1 vs. 529.3 ± 237.9 μg; P =0.002). However, for fentanyl consumption 0–48 h, the difference between the two groups was not significant (710.9 ± 312.8 vs. 850.9 ± 292.0 μg; P =0.078). There were no differences in the incidences of adverse events or chronic pain between the groups. Conclusions: Overall, the multimodal analgesic approach reduced postoperative pain after an open radical gastrectomy procedure in all patients anesthetized with either propofol or sevoflurane. Furthermore, our results indicated better analgesic outcome for the propofol group, especially in the early postoperative period.
机译:目的:胃癌根治术后,患者可能会感到剧烈疼痛。一些研究报告说,使用异丙酚可明显减轻术后疼痛,而另一些研究则认为这种作用并不明显。因此,我们旨在评估使用异丙酚麻醉是否可以减轻开放式根治性胃切除术后的疼痛。患者和方法:60例计划行剖腹手术进行根治性胃切除术的患者被随机分为丙泊酚或七氟醚组(每组n = 30)。维持目标控制的异丙酚输注或七氟醚的吸入,滴定至双光谱指数40-60。所有患者均接受了标准化的多模式镇痛计划,包括术中右美托咪定,地塞米松和术后氟比洛芬酯,以及患者控制的芬太尼。记录出院后1个月和3个月的血流动力学,疼痛评分,芬太尼消耗,不良事件和慢性疼痛的发生率。结果:所有患者的术后疼痛强度均相对较低至中等。与七氟醚组相比,异丙酚组在静息和咳嗽时在术后48小时的疼痛评分更低(P <0.05)。丙泊酚组术后0-24小时的芬太尼累积消耗量较低(364.4±139.1 vs. 529.3±237.9μg; P = 0.002)。但是,对于芬太尼消耗0-48小时,两组之间的差异并不显着(710.9±312.8与850.9±292.0μg; P = 0.078)。两组之间不良事件或慢性疼痛的发生率无差异。结论:总的来说,在所有接受异丙酚或七氟醚麻醉的患者中,多模式镇痛方法可减少行彻底根治性胃切除术后的术后疼痛。此外,我们的结果表明丙泊酚组的镇痛效果更好,尤其是在术后早期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号