首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India >Comparative Study of Cesarean Myomectomy with Abdominal Myomectomy in Terms of Blood Loss in Single Fibroid
【24h】

Comparative Study of Cesarean Myomectomy with Abdominal Myomectomy in Terms of Blood Loss in Single Fibroid

机译:剖宫产术与腹部肌瘤切除术在单肌瘤失血方面的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of cesarean myomectomy and compare this procedure with abdominal myomectomy in single fibroid, in terms of blood loss and postoperative complications. Methods Thirty-three patients who underwent cesarean myomectomy from June 2006 to 2012 in Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, were included in the study. Almost an equal number of patients who underwent abdominal myomectomy (32) in the same period were included. Women are divided into two groups: group 1—cesarean myomectomy, group 2—abdominal myomectomy. Results Mean age of the women was comparable; mean gestational age in group 1 was 37.97?+/??1.57?weeks; and 60?% were primiparous. Hemoglobin (Hb) drop postoperatively was compared between the groups, and there was no significant difference. Though there was statistically significant difference among the groups regarding the size of fibroids, the main outcome measure of the study, the Hb drop was comparable between group 1 and 2. There is statistically significant difference in the Hb difference with increasing mean diameter of the fibroids. As the size increases, Hb drop also increases indicating the increasing blood loss. The measures used to reduce blood loss such as vasopressin instillation and stepwise devascularization influence the blood loss, and P value shows borderline significance. There was no difference in Hb drop among the groups according to the type of fibroids. But more subserous fibroids were removed in group 1, whereas more intramural fibroids were removed in group 2. Conclusion Cesarean myomectomy can be safely done in single fibroids and is comparable to abdominal myomectomy in terms of blood loss.
机译:目的在本研究中,我们评估剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术的安全性和可行性,并就失血和术后并发症方面与单肌瘤腹腔子宫肌瘤切除术进行比较。方法对2006年6月至2012年在美国阿姆利塔医学院进行剖宫产子宫切除术的33例患者进行研究。几乎包括相同时期接受腹部子宫肌瘤切除术的患者(32)。妇女分为两组:第一组-剖宫产子宫切除术,第二组-腹腔子宫切除术。结果妇女的平均年龄是可比的;第一组的平均胎龄为37.97?+ /?1.57?周。和60%是初生的。比较两组患者术后血红蛋白(Hb)下降情况,无显着差异。尽管各组在肌瘤大小方面存在统计学上的显着差异,但该研究的主要结局指标是,第1组和第2组之间的Hb下降具有可比性。随着肌瘤平均直径的增加,Hb差异有统计学意义。 。随着大小的增加,血红蛋白下降也增加,表明失血增加。降压药滴注和逐步血运重建等减少失血的措施会影响失血,P值具有临界意义。根据肌瘤的类型,Hb下降在各组之间没有差异。但是,在第1组中去除了更多的浆膜下肌瘤,而在第2组中去除了更多的壁内肌瘤。结论剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术可以安全地在单个肌瘤中完成,并且在失血方面与腹部子宫肌瘤切除术相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号