首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Natural Science Biology and Medicine >Conventional versus digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation
【24h】

Conventional versus digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation

机译:传统法与数字法在法医年龄评估中测量牙本质透明度的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Root dentine translucency remains the method of choice providing the most accurate results for age estimation. Conventionally, translucency is measured using calipers. In recent times, computer-based methods are proposed, which require the use of custom-built software programs.Aims and Objectives:The aim was to use a digital method to measure dentinal translucency on sectioned teeth and to compare digital measurements to conventionally obtained translucency measurements.Materials and Methods:A total of 200 extracted permanent teeth were collected and were sectioned to a thickness of 250 μm. Translucency measurements were obtained using the digital method and compared with those obtained using a caliper.Results:Correlation coefficients of translucency measurements to age were statistically significant for both methods (P < 0.001), although marginally higher correlation was observed for the conventional method (r = 0.612). Application of derived linear regression equations on an independent sample (n = 25) suggested that conventional approach is marginally better in estimating age to within 5 years of the actual age, both the methods are similar in assessing age within 5-10 years of the actual age, and digital approach is marginally better in estimating age beyond 10 years of actual age.Conclusion:The translucency measurements obtained by the two methods were identical, with no clear superiority of one method over the other.
机译:背景:牙本质半透明仍然是为年龄估计提供最准确结果的选择方法。常规地,半透明性是使用卡尺来测量的。近年来,提出了基于计算机的方法,这些方法需要使用定制的软件程序。目的和目的:目的是使用一种数字方法来测量切片牙齿上的牙本质半透明性,并将数字测量与常规获得的半透明性进行比较。材料与方法:总共收集200颗拔出的恒牙,并切成250μm的厚度。结果:半透明性测量值与年龄的相关系数在统计学上均具有统计学意义(P <0.001),尽管常规方法的相关性略高(r = 0.612)。在独立样本(n = 25)上应用导出的线性回归方程式表明,常规方法在估计实际年龄的5年以内的年龄方面略胜一筹,这两种方法在评估实际年龄的5-10年内的年龄均相似年龄,数字方法在估计实际年龄超过10岁时略胜一筹。结论:这两种方法获得的半透明性测量结果相同,没有一种方法明显优于另一种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号