首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurological sciences (Turkish) >Supratentorial Mass Lesion Biopsy Using Frameless Stereotactic System; Diagnostic Yield, Surgical Morbidity, and Comparison With Freehand Biopsy
【24h】

Supratentorial Mass Lesion Biopsy Using Frameless Stereotactic System; Diagnostic Yield, Surgical Morbidity, and Comparison With Freehand Biopsy

机译:使用无框架立体定向系统的幕上大块病变活检;诊断产率,手术发病率以及与徒手活检的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective :The objective of this study is based on a comparison of freehand and stereotactic biopsy regarding diagnostic yield in terms of adequate tissue sample, morbidity in terms of postoperative complications like neurological deficit, bleeding, infection etc. and mortality. Material and Methods :A randomized clinical study was carried out and included 70 patients (35 patients underwent freehand biopsy and 35 patients underwent stereotactic biopsy). The data was collected for variables including age, sex, location and size of tumor. The outcome was assessed by diagnostic yield in terms of adequate tissue sample, morbidity in terms of postoperative complications like neurological deficit, bleeding, infection etc. and mortality between the two groups was compared. Results :Total 70 biopsies were excised and 35 (50%) of them underwent freehand biopsy while the rest of 35 (50%) underwent stereotactic biopsy. Freehand biopsy was associated with 5.71% morbidity, compared to 2.85% morbidity for stereotactic biopsy. Four freehand biopsies (11.42%) and two stereotactic biopsies (5.71%) were non-diagnostic. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between morbidity in the two groups. The rate of diagnostic failure between two groups was not significantly different with a p-value of 0.673, but it was found significant clinically. Conclusion :Stereotactic biopsy has provided us with a powerful and a safer tool to provide tissue diagnosis with minimal disruption of the normal-functioning studies, though with minimal morbidity. Our study is comparable to other international studies there is very little difference in the morbidity but significant difference in diagnostic yield.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是根据徒手和立体定向活检的比较,以就足够的组织样本而言的诊断产量,就神经并发症,出血,感染等术后并发症的发病率和死亡率而言的发病率进行比较。材料和方法:进行了一项随机临床研究,包括70例患者(35例患者进行了徒手活检和35例患者进行了立体定向活检)。收集有关变量的数据,包括年龄,性别,肿瘤的位置和大小。通过诊断合格率,充足的组织样本,发病率,术后并发症(如神经系统缺陷,出血,感染等)和两组的死亡率进行比较,评估了结果。结果:总共切除了70例活检,其中35例(50%)进行了徒手活检,其余35例(50%)进行了立体定向活检。徒手活检的发病率为5.71%,而立体定向活检的发病率为2.85%。四个徒手活检(11.42%)和两个立体定向活检(5.71%)未诊断。统计学分析显示两组的发病率之间无显着差异。两组之间的诊断失败率无显着差异,p值为0.673,但在临床上发现显着。结论:立体定向穿刺活检为我们提供了一个功能强大且更安全的工具,可在不影响正常功能研究的前提下,对组织进行诊断,同时将发病率降至最低。我们的研究可与其他国际研究相媲美,其发病率差异很小,但诊断率却有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号