首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Men s Health >The Validity of Alternative Hand Wall Toss Tests in Korean Children
【24h】

The Validity of Alternative Hand Wall Toss Tests in Korean Children

机译:在韩国儿童中进行替代性手壁抛掷测试的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify how the difficulty level of Alternative Hand Wall Toss (AHWT) test changed according to the distance between wall and subject (2.0 m or 1.2 m) and to determine the proper distance for 11–12 years old elementary school students.Material and Methods: Fitness measurement data from participants of “A Study on Development of Fitness Accreditation Standards for National Fitness Award 100 Elementary School Students (aged 11 to 12) in 2018” (total n = 2,753; 2.0 m, n = 1,428; 1.2 m, n = 1,325) were selected. The ratio of numbers, means, and standard deviations of subjects who were unable to measure according to distance were calculated. Difficulty levels of 6 fitness tests including AHWT test by applying Rasch model of Item Response Theory (IRT) were calculated, and AHWT test difficulty levels according to distance, 2.0 m and 1.2 m were compared. All statistical significance levels were set at p < 0.05.Results: Our findings were as follows: First, the ratios of subjects who performed 0 point (action) according to distance were 41% and 5.2% at 2.0 m and 1.2 m, respectively; Second, there was no difference of difficulty level among five test items except for the AHWT test; the difficulty level of the AHWT test was higher at 2.0 m than at 1.2 m.Conclusion: In conclusion, it is difficult to discriminate the ability of 11–12-year-old subjects if the distance to the wall is set to 2.0 m in the AHWT test because the difficulty level is too high. Therefore, we recommend setting the distance to 1.2 m for 11–12-year-old subjects. The results of this study are expected to be used as baseline data for eye-hand coordination tests for elementary school students.
机译:背景与目的:本研究的目的是确定替代手壁抛掷(AHWT)测试的难度水平如何根据壁与受试者之间的距离(2.0 m或1.2 m)而变化,并确定11– 12岁的小学生。材料与方法:来自“ 2018年全民健身奖100名小学生(11至12岁)健身认证标准发展研究”参与者的健身测量数据(总计n = 2,753; 2.0) m,n = 1,428; 1.2 m,n = 1,325)。计算无法根据距离进行测量的对象的数量,平均值和标准偏差之比。应用项目响应理论(IRT)的Rasch模型计算了包括AHWT测试在内的6种适应性测试的难度级别,并根据距离,2.0 m和1.2 m比较了AHWT测试难度级别。所有统计显着性水平均设置为p <0.05。结果:我们的发现如下:首先,在2.0 m和1.2 m处,根据距离执行0点(动作)的受试者的比例分别为41%和5.2%。其次,除AHWT测试外,五个测试项目的难度等级没有差异。 AHWT测试的难度水平在2.0 m时比在1.2 m时要高。结论:总的来说,如果到墙壁的距离设置为2.0 m,则很难区分11-12岁的受试者的能力。 AHWT测试是因为难度级别太高。因此,我们建议将11-12岁的受试者的距离设置为1.2 m。预期该研究结果将用作小学生眼手协调测试的基准数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号