首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Local and Global Health Science >Ambulance use among road injury victims: results from Pakistan National Emergency Departments Surveillance
【24h】

Ambulance use among road injury victims: results from Pakistan National Emergency Departments Surveillance

机译:道路受伤受害者中使用救护车:巴基斯坦国家紧急部门的监测结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Ambulance use in low-and middle-income countries is very low. This study assesses characteristics of road traffic injury (RTI) victims coming to emergency departments (EDs) by ambulance and compares with RTI victims coming via alternative modes of transportation. The Pakistan National Emergency Departments Surveillance (Pak-NEDS) was a surveillance conducted in seven major tertiary-care EDs in six main cities of Pakistan from November 2010-March 2011. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was carried out to investigate the factors associated with ambulance use in RTI patients. The variables used for regression gender, age groups, cities, hospital type, road user type and disposition. There were four age categories; ≤18 years, 19 -45 years, 45 – R years and ≥65 years. RTI patients were divided into two road-user groups; VRUs (pedestrian, motorcycle driver and passenger, bicyclists) and non-vulnerable road-users (non-VRUs) including four-wheel vehicles' driver and passengers. Level of significance was set at 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained at all participating sites. Pak-NEDS enrolled 9769 RTI patients. The mode of arrival was known for 92.2% (n=9009) RTI patients, of which 9.1%(n=821) were brought to the ED by ambulance. The mean age was higher in the ambulance group (33.3±16.9 versus 28.8±14.1 years, p-value 0.001). The most common road-user in the ambulance group was motorcycle drivers (n=201,24.5%) and pedestrians (n=3131,38.2%) in the non-ambulance group. Head and neck injuries (n=240,32.9%) in ambulance and upper limb injuries (n=2470, 34.3%) in non-ambulance group were common. There were 3.7% (n=23) deaths in the ambulance group and only 0.6% (n=38) in the non-ambulance group. Patients of all age groups were more likely to use ambulance compared to those 65 years of age (p-value0.001) adjusted for gender, cities, hospital type, road use type and disposition. The adjusted odds ratio of utilizing ambulances for VRUs was 1.3 times higher than non-VRUs (p-value0.008). Although the overall use of ambulance for RTI patients is very low in Pakistan, however, we found that RTI patients who used ambulance were more likely to be younger and VRUs. Majority of these patients had suffered from head and neck injuries and were more likely to die in the ED.
机译:低收入和中等收入国家的救护车使用率很低。这项研究评估了通过救护车进入急诊部门(ED)的道路交通伤害(RTI)受害者的特征,并将其与通过其他运输方式来的RTI受害者进行了比较。巴基斯坦国家紧急部门监视(Pak-NEDS)是从2010年11月至2011年3月在巴基斯坦六个主要城市的7个主要三级急诊室进行的监视。进行了单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析,以调查与救护车相关的因素用于RTI患者。用于回归性别,年龄组,城市,医院类型,道路使用者类型和处置的变量。有四个年龄段; ≤18年,19 -45年,45 – R年和≥65年。 RTI患者被分为两个道路使用者组; VRU(行人,摩托车驾驶员和乘客,骑自行车的人)和包括四轮车驾驶员和乘客在内的无害道路使用者(非VRU)。显着性水平设定为0.05。所有参与地点均获得了道德批准。 Pak-NEDS招募了9769 RTI患者。已知92.2%(n = 9009)RTI患者的到达方式,其中9.1%(n = 821)由救护车送往急诊室。救护车组的平均年龄较高(33.3±16.9岁对28.8±14.1岁,p值<0.001)。非救护车组中最常见的道路使用者是摩托车驾驶员(n = 201,24.5%)和行人(n = 3131,38.2%)。救护车头颈部受伤(n = 240,32.9%)和非救护车组上肢受伤(n = 2470,34.3%)很常见。救护车组死亡3.7%(n = 23),非救护车组只有0.6%(n = 38)。与经过年龄,性别,城市,医院类型,道路使用类型和处置方式调整的> 65岁(p值<0.001)相比,所有年龄段的患者更可能使用救护车。 VRU使用救护车的调整后优势比是非VRU的1.3倍(p值0.008)。尽管巴基斯坦对RTI患者的救护车总体使用率很低,但是,我们发现,使用救护车的RTI患者更可能是年轻且VRU。这些患者中的大多数人头部和颈部受伤,更可能在急诊室死亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号