...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society >Open Surgical Evacuation of Spontaneous Putaminal Hematomas: Prognostic Factors and Comparison of Outcomes between Transsylvian and Transcortical Approaches
【24h】

Open Surgical Evacuation of Spontaneous Putaminal Hematomas: Prognostic Factors and Comparison of Outcomes between Transsylvian and Transcortical Approaches

机译:自发性腹股沟血肿的开放式外科手术疏散:Transsylvian和经皮层入路的预后因素和结果比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the surgical outcome and to compare the surgical results between transsylvian and transcortical approaches in patients with putaminal hematomas. Methods Retrospective review of charts and CT scan images was conducted in 45 patients (20 transsylvian and 25 transcortical approaches) who underwent open surgical evacuation of putaminal hematomas. Mean Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score and hematoma volume were 7.5±3.2 and 78.1±29.3 cc, respectively. The factors affecting the functional mortality were investigated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. In addition, surgical results between transsylvian and transcortical approaches were compared. Results None of the patients had a good recovery after the surgery. Overall functional survival rate and mortality were 37.7% and 31%, respectively. The only risk factor for functional mortality was GCS motor score after controlling age, history of hypertension, side of hematoma, hematoma amount, midline shift, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage and surgical approach ( p =0.005). Even though a transcortical approach was shorter in operative time (4.4 versus 5.1 hour) and showed a higher mortality rate (40% versus 20%) and lower functional survival (45% versus 35%) compared to the transsylvian approach, the differences were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion In patients who have large amounts of hematoma and require open surgical evacuation, the only significant risk factor for functional survival is the preoperative GCS score. Cortical incision methods such as transsylvian and transcortical approaches have no influence on the surgical outcome. To decompress the swollen brain rapidly, transcortical approach seems to be more suitable than transsylvian approach.
机译:目的本研究的目的是探讨影响手术效果的因素,并比较经鼻腔和经皮层入路治疗put状血肿患者的手术效果。方法回顾性回顾性分析45例行开放式手术切除肠壁血肿的45例患者(20例经颅突入路和25例经皮皮质入路)。格拉斯哥昏迷平均评分(GCS)评分和血肿体积分别为7.5±3.2和78.1±29.3 cc。使用多元逻辑回归分析研究影响功能性死亡的因素。此外,比较了经希尔和皮层入路的手术效果。结果术后无一例患者恢复良好。总体功能生存率和死亡率分别为37.7%和31%。功能性死亡的唯一危险因素是控制年龄,高血压病史,血肿侧,血肿量,中线移位,脑室内出血的存在和手术方式后的GCS运动评分(p = 0.005)。尽管经皮层入路的手术时间较短(4.4小时对5.1小时),并且死亡率比前者为高(40%对20%)和功能存活率较低(45%对35%),但差异没有两组之间具有统计学意义。结论在有大量血肿且需要开放手术疏散的患者中,功能存活的唯一重要危险因素是术前GCS评分。皮质切口方法(如经希尔斯维亚和经皮质途径)对手术结果没有影响。为了迅速减压肿胀的大脑,经皮层入路的方法似乎比经椎弓根入路的方法更合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号